Literature DB >> 28311929

Behavioural adaptations of ground living bushcrickets to the properties of sound propagation in low grassland.

Armin Keuper1, Klaus Kalmring1, Andrea Schatral1, William Latimer1, Werner Kaiser1.   

Abstract

The acoustic behaviour of the closely related tetigoniid species Psorodonotus illyricus and Decticus verrucivorus have been invectigated by bioacoustical and behavioural methods. Both species show adaptations concerning the acoustic behaviour with respect to the biotope and the properties of sound propagation. These insects inhabit low grassland with an average vegetation height of about 20 cm which is also the general height for the song perches. Difficulties arise for efficient acoustic communication in such habitats. Sound propagation is influenced and limited by the strong ground attenuation and the excess damping by grass vegetation. Other limiting factors are the microclimatic conditions in the biotope. The two species counteract these difficulties by moving around in the biotope during stridulation. Both species mainly stridulate in the morning, avoiding problems of reduced sound transmission which often appear in the afternoon due to negative temperature gradients and resulting shadow zones. From the high mobility of these insects, it follows that individuals have no fixed territory and consequently no rivalry against conspecifics, which is very common among Orthopterans with a high degree of territoriality. It can be concluded that the preferred biotope influences and creates behavioural patterns in Orthopterans, especially here in the two investigated species of bushcrickets Psorodonotus illyricus and Decticus verrucivorus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptations; Behaviour; Bioacoustics; Bushcrickets; Ground-living

Year:  1986        PMID: 28311929     DOI: 10.1007/BF00379505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

1.  Propagation of Environmental Noise: More theoretical and experimental work could permit the prediction and subsequent control of environmental noise.

Authors:  R H Lyon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The acoustic behaviour of the bushcricket Tettigonia cantans I. Behavioural responses to sound and vibration.

Authors:  W Latimer; A Schatral
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  The acoustic behaviour of the bushcricket Tettigonia cantans II. Transmission of airborne-sound and vibration signals in the biotope.

Authors:  A Keuper; R Kühne
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  The acoustic behaviour of the bush cricket Pholidoptera griseoaptera. I. Alternation, synchronism and rivalry between males.

Authors:  M D Jones
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 3.312

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Distribution and population density of the bushcricket Decticus verrucivorus in a damp-meadow biotope.

Authors:  Stephan Weidemann; Oliver Stiedl; Klaus Kalmring
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Neural Mechanisms for Acoustic Signal Detection under Strong Masking in an Insect.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kostarakos; Heiner Römer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Maintaining acoustic communication at a cocktail party: heterospecific masking noise improves signal detection through frequency separation.

Authors:  M E Siegert; H Römer; M Hartbauer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Call and be counted! Can we reliably estimate the number of callers in the indri's (Indri indri) song?

Authors:  Valeria Torti; Daria Valente; Chiara De Gregorio; Carlo Comazzi; Longondraza Miaretsoa; Jonah Ratsimbazafy; Cristina Giacoma; Marco Gamba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.