Literature DB >> 28311835

The relationship among egg size, density and food level on larval development in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica).

Keith A Berven1, Brian G Chadra1.   

Abstract

Although inter- and intraspecific variation in egg size among amphibians has been well documented, the relationship between egg size and fitness remains unclear. Recent attempts to correlate egg size intraspecifically with larval developmental patterns have been equivocal. In this study the development of larvae derived from large eggs and small eggs, from a single population in Maryland were compared under a range of food levels and larval population densities. Both food level and density had significant effects on the length of the larval period and size at metamorphosis. However, the response among larvae derived from different egg sizes was not additive. At low densities and high food levels, larvae from small eggs had longer larval periods and a larger size at metamorphosis than larvae derived from large eggs. In contrast, at high densities larvae from small eggs had longer developmental periods but were smaller at metamorphosis than larvae from large eggs. In addition, larvae from small eggs were more sensitive to density irrespective of food level. These results suggest that optimal egg size is correlated with environmental factors, which may explain the maintenance of both geographic and within population variation in egg size commonly observed in amphibians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Density; Development; Egg size; Food level; Rana sylvatica

Year:  1988        PMID: 28311835     DOI: 10.1007/BF00378815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  14 in total

1.  Developmental plasticity and maternal effects of reproductive characteristics in the frog, Bombina orientalis.

Authors:  R H Kaplan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  VARIATION IN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS OF LARVAL ANURANS IN TEMPORARY PONDS. I. PERSISTENT VARIATION WITHIN A HYLA GRATIOSA POPULATION.

Authors:  Joseph Travis
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  THE ECOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIP OF THE SALAMANDER AMBYSTOMA LATERALE TO ITS ALL-FEMALE, GYNOGENETIC ASSOCIATE.

Authors:  Henry M Wilbur
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  COMPARATIVE REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF MONTANE AND PIEDMONT CHORUS FROGS.

Authors:  David Pettus; George M Angleton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  PHENOTYPIC VARIATION AND THE OUTCOME OF INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION IN HYLID TADPOLES.

Authors:  Joseph Travis
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  CORRELATIONS OF QUANTITATIVE PARAMETERS OF FECUNDITY IN AMPHIBIANS.

Authors:  Mitsuru Kuramoto
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  The genetic basis of altitudinal variation in the wood frog Rana sylvatica II. An experimental analysis of larval development.

Authors:  Keith A Berven
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  THE GENETIC BASIS OF ALTITUDINAL VARIATION IN THE WOOD FROG RANA SYLVATICA. I. AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF LIFE HISTORY TRAITS.

Authors:  Keith A Berven
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  COUNTERGRADIENT SELECTION IN THE GREEN FROG, RANA CLAMITANS.

Authors:  Keith A Berven; Douglas E Gill; Sandra J Smith-Gill
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Ecological Aspects of Amphibian Metamorphosis: Nonnormal distributions of competitive ability reflect selection for facultative metamorphosis.

Authors:  H M Wilbur; J P Collins
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-12-28       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Tadpole mortality varies across experimental venues: do laboratory populations predict responses in nature?

Authors:  Steven D Melvin; Jeff E Houlahan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Patterns and fitness consequences of intraclutch variation in egg provisioning in tropical Australian frogs.

Authors:  Martin A Dziminski; Ross A Alford
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Larval amphibian growth and development under varying density: are parasitized individuals poor competitors?

Authors:  J Koprivnikar; M R Forbes; R L Baker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Maternal effects on offspring growth and development depend on environmental quality in the frogBombina orientalis.

Authors:  David M Parichy; Robert H Kaplan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Maternal investment in egg size: environment- and population-specific effects on offspring performance.

Authors:  Katja Räsänen; Anssi Laurila; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Geographic variation in maternal investment and trade-offs between egg size and clutch size in an endemic toad of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.

Authors:  Tong Lei Yu; Yao Hui Deng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Development and infectious disease in hosts with complex life cycles.

Authors:  Catherine L Searle; Gisselle Yang Xie; Andrew R Blaustein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Physiological, behavioral and maternal factors that contribute to size variation in larval amphibian populations.

Authors:  Robin W Warne; Adam Kardon; Erica J Crespi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Giants, dwarfs and the environment - metamorphic trait plasticity in the common frog.

Authors:  Franziska Grözinger; Jürgen Thein; Heike Feldhaar; Mark-Oliver Rödel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Egg size effects across multiple life-history stages in the marine annelid Hydroides diramphus.

Authors:  Richard M Allen; Dustin Marshall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.