Literature DB >> 28311770

The allometry of the weight of fruit on trees and shrubs in Barbados.

R H Peters1, S Cloutier1, D Dubé1, A Evans1, P Hastings1, H Kaiser1, D Kohn1, B Sarwer-Foner1.   

Abstract

Branch sampling of branch diameter and fruit crop on 22 species of Barbadian trees and shrubs provided sufficient data to build regressions between plant size and fruit crop weight. Orchard plants bear much more fruit than wild, feral or garden plants of similar size, but this difference disappears in multiple regression of fruit crop weight (F in g, fresh mass) on branch or stem diameter (D in cm) and individual fruit weight (W in g): F=22D1.2 W0.57. This explains 89% of the variation in F and successfully predicts crop weight for wild tropical and temperate trees and shrubs, but underestimated the crops on commercial, temperate, fruit trees by an order of magnitude. Comparisons of crop weight for feral, wild, and garden plants (Ff) using a simple regression Ff=47D1.9 show that crop weight is a minor load relative to branch weight for larger branches. Although fruit crops represent a declining proportion of total plant weight as plants become larger, the crops become larger relative to leaf and twig weight and in this sense, reproductive investment increases in larger plants. Finally, our equations, combined with the self-thinning rule, suggest that stands of large species of fruit plants produce more fruit per unit of land area than stands of small ones.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fruit weight; Plant allometry; Trees

Year:  1988        PMID: 28311770     DOI: 10.1007/BF00380061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  3 in total

1.  Scaling in tensile "skeletons": structures with scale-independent length dimensions.

Authors:  J A Peterson; J A Benson; M Ngai; J Morin; C Ow
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-09-24       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Size and shape in biology.

Authors:  T McMahon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-03-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CIRCUMFERENCE AND WEIGHT IN TREES AND ITS BEARING ON BRANCHING ANGLES.

Authors:  C D Murray
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1927-05-20       Impact factor: 4.086

  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  Size and sex allocation in monoecious woody plants.

Authors:  John F Fox
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Multiple central place foraging by spider monkeys: travel consequences of using many sleeping sites.

Authors:  C A Chapman; L J Chapman; R L McLaughlin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effects of intrinsic environmental predictability on intra-individual and intra-population variability of plant reproductive traits and eco-evolutionary consequences.

Authors:  Martí March-Salas; Guillermo Fandos; Patrick S Fitze
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Anthropogenic edges impact howler monkey (Alouatta palliata) feeding behaviour in a Costa Rican rainforest.

Authors:  Laura M Bolt; Dorian G Russell; Amy L Schreier
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.163

5.  Is there tree senescence? The fecundity evidence.

Authors:  Tong Qiu; Marie-Claire Aravena; Robert Andrus; Davide Ascoli; Yves Bergeron; Roberta Berretti; Michal Bogdziewicz; Thomas Boivin; Raul Bonal; Thomas Caignard; Rafael Calama; J Julio Camarero; Connie J Clark; Benoit Courbaud; Sylvain Delzon; Sergio Donoso Calderon; William Farfan-Rios; Catherine A Gehring; Gregory S Gilbert; Cathryn H Greenberg; Qinfeng Guo; Janneke Hille Ris Lambers; Kazuhiko Hoshizaki; Ines Ibanez; Valentin Journé; Christopher L Kilner; Richard K Kobe; Walter D Koenig; Georges Kunstler; Jalene M LaMontagne; Mateusz Ledwon; James A Lutz; Renzo Motta; Jonathan A Myers; Thomas A Nagel; Chase L Nuñez; Ian S Pearse; Łukasz Piechnik; John R Poulsen; Renata Poulton-Kamakura; Miranda D Redmond; Chantal D Reid; Kyle C Rodman; C Lane Scher; Harald Schmidt Van Marle; Barbara Seget; Shubhi Sharma; Miles Silman; Jennifer J Swenson; Margaret Swift; Maria Uriarte; Giorgio Vacchiano; Thomas T Veblen; Amy V Whipple; Thomas G Whitham; Andreas P Wion; S Joseph Wright; Kai Zhu; Jess K Zimmerman; Magdalena Żywiec; James S Clark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Male endocrine response to seasonally varying environmental and social factors in a neotropical primate, Cebus capucinus.

Authors:  Valérie A M Schoof; Tyler R Bonnell; Katharine M Jack; Toni E Ziegler; Amanda D Melin; Linda M Fedigan
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.868

7.  Selective pressure along a latitudinal gradient affects subindividual variation in plants.

Authors:  Mar Sobral; José Guitián; Pablo Guitián; Asier R Larrinaga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.