Literature DB >> 28311494

Tissue water relations of four co-occurring chaparral shrubs.

S D Davis1, H A Mooney1.   

Abstract

Chaparral shrubs of California have a suite of morphological and physiological adaptations to withstand the prolonged summer droughts of a mediterranean climate. Not all species of chaparral have the same rooting depth and there is some evidence that those with shallow roots have tissue that is most tolerant to water stress. We tested this notion by comparing the tissue water relations of four co-occurring chaparral shrubs: Quercus durata, Heteromeles arbutifolia, Adenostoma fasciculatum, and Rhamnus californica. We used a pressure-volume technique and a dew-point hygrometer to metsure seasonal changes in osmotic potential when plant tissue was fully hydrated and osmotic potential at predawn, midday, and the turgor loss point. We also calculated seasonal changes in the minimum daily turgor potential, saturated weight/dry weight ratio of leaf tissue, and the bulk modulus of elasticity. We had information on the seasonal water use patterns and apparent rooting depths of these same four shrubs from a previous study (Davis and Mooney 1986). All evidence indicated that Rhamnus had shallow roots and Quercus deep roots. Our results indicated that the tissue water relations of our four co-occurring chaparral shrubs were not alike. Even though Rhamnus had shallow roots, it had the least xerophytic tissue. Seasonal osmotic potential and saturated weight/dry weight ratios were relatively high and bulk modulus of elasticity and minimum daily turgor potentials were low. Furthermore, even though Quercus had deep roots and experienced no seasonal water stress at our study site, its tissue water relations indicated relatively high tolerance to water stress. We conclude that seasonal drought tolerance of stem and leaf tissue of co-occurring chaparral shrubs does not necessarily correspond to rooting depth, to soil moisture resources available to the shrub, or to the degree of seasonal water stress experienced by the shrub.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chaparral; Dew-point hygrometry; Osmotic potential; Pressure-volume curve; Turgor

Year:  1986        PMID: 28311494     DOI: 10.1007/BF00379899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Measurement of tissue osmotic pressure.

Authors:  W Wenkert
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Comparison between pressure-volume and dewpoint-hygrometry techniques for determining the water relations characteristics of grass and legume leaves.

Authors:  J R Wilson; M J Fisher; E -D Schulze; G R Dolby; M M Ludlow
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Root systems of chaparral shrubs.

Authors:  Jochen Kummerow; David Krause; William Jow
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Summer water relations of the desert phreatophyte Prosopis glandulosa in the Sonoran Desert of southern California.

Authors:  Erik T Nilsen; Philip W Rundel; M Rasoul Sharifi
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Seasonal patterns of leaf water relations in four co-occurring forest tree species: Parameters from pressure-volume curves.

Authors:  Stephen W Roberts; Boyd R Strain; Kenneth R Knoerr
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Water use patterns of four co-occurring chaparral shrubs.

Authors:  S D Davis; H A Mooney
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Comparative water relations of adjacent california shrub and grassland communities.

Authors:  S D Davis; H A Mooney
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Water balance in developing leaves of four tropical savanna woody species.

Authors:  Frederick Meinzer; Virginia Seymour; Guillermo Goldstein
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.225

  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Bud morphology and shoot growth dynamics in two species of Mediterranean sub-shrubs co-existing in gypsum outcrops.

Authors:  Sara Palacio; Gabriel Montserrat-Martí
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Ecophysiological differences among juvenile and reproductive plants of several woody species.

Authors:  Lisa A Donovan; James R Ehleringer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Drought acclimation among tropical forest shrubs (Psychotria, Rubiaceae).

Authors:  S Joseph Wright; José Luis Machado; Stephen S Mulkey; Alan P Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Water use patterns of four co-occurring chaparral shrubs.

Authors:  S D Davis; H A Mooney
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Comparative physiology of burned and unburned Rhus laurina after chaparral wildfire.

Authors:  J DeSouza; P A Silka; S D Davis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Field water relations of three temperate vines.

Authors:  D J Bell; I N Forseth; A H Teramura
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Tissue water relations of three chaparral shrub species after wildfire.

Authors:  M W Saruwatari; S D Davis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Tissue-water relations of two co-occurring evergreen Mediterranean species in response to seasonal and experimental drought conditions.

Authors:  Lydia Serrano; Josep Peñuelas; Romà Ogaya; Robert Savé
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Effects of nursery preconditioning through mycorrhizal inoculation and drought in Arbutus unedo L. plants.

Authors:  Alejandra Navarro García; Sebastián Del Pilar Bañón Árias; Asunción Morte; María Jesús Sánchez-Blanco
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.387

10.  Intraspecific variation in the water relations of Salix arctica, an arctic-alpine dwarf willow.

Authors:  T E Dawson; L C Bliss
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.225

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.