Literature DB >> 28311261

Size differences in migrant sandpiper flocks: ghosts in ephemeral guilds.

Jan L Eldridge1, Douglas H Johnson2.   

Abstract

Scolopacid sandpipers were studied from 1980 until 1984 during spring migration in North Dakota. Common species foraging together in mixed-species flocks differed in bill length most often by 20 to 30 percent (ratios from 1.2:1 to 1.3:1). Observed flocks were compared to computer generated flocks drawn from three source pools of Arctic-nesting sandpipers. The source pools included 51 migrant species from a global pool, 33 migrant species from a Western Hemisphere pool, and 13 species that migrated though North Dakota. The observed flocks formed randomly from the available species that used the North Dakota migration corridor but the North Dakota species were not a random selection from the Western Hemisphere and global pools of Arctic-nesting scolopacid sandpipers. In short, the ephemeral, mixed-species foraging flocks that we observed in North Dakota were random mixes from a nonrandom pool. The size-ratio distributions were consistent with the interpretation that use of this migration corridor by sandpipers has been influenced by some form of sizerelated selection such as competition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Competition; Migration; Null models; Shorebirds; Size ratio

Year:  1988        PMID: 28311261     DOI: 10.1007/BF00377257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Santa Rosalia Was a Goat: Ecologists have for two decades made assumptions about the importance of competition in community organization; that idea is now under vigorous attack.

Authors:  R Lewin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-08-12       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  PATTERN AND CHANCE IN THE STRUCTURE OF MODEL AND NATURAL COMMUNITIES.

Authors:  Ted J Case; Ron Sidell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  TESTS OF COMMUNITY-WIDE CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT AGAINST NULL HYPOTHESES.

Authors:  Donald R Strong; Lee Ann Szyska; Daniel S Simberloff
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  SANTA ROSALIA RECONSIDERED: SIZE RATIOS AND COMPETITION.

Authors:  Daniel Simberloff; William Boecklen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Niche overlap and diffuse competition.

Authors:  E R Pianka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.