Literature DB >> 28311108

The turnover of milkweed pollinia on bumble bees, and implications for outcrossing.

Douglass H Morse1.   

Abstract

Bumble bees (Bombus spp.) picked up a pollen packet (pollinium) of milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.) every 2-5 h, usually more rapidly on their feet than on their mouthparts. Pollinia were retained an average of slightly over one day on the mouthparts and one-quarter day on the feet. This long retention period enhances the possibility of outcrossing in this largely or completely self-incompatible species. Although many more pollinia were carried on the feet, the longer retention of those on the mouthparts resulted in their collective outcrossing potential exceeding that of pollinia on the feet. Once pollinia became attached to the bees (via their attachment mechanisms, the corpuscula), others often attached to the translator arms (connecting corpusculum with pollinia) of the first pollinia. Long strings of pollinia and corpuscula often resulted, but they frequently were shed down to a single corpusculum, which was usually retained for long periods (estimated retention time=12-43 days). During the middle and latter part of the flowering period about two-thirds of the bees' feet carried only a single corpusculum. Feet in this condition picked up extremely few pollinia and thus were largely unavailable as sites for pollen transfer. Having several single corpuscula on the feet greatly lowered the number of pollinia carried by a bee over the season. Single corpuscula occurred much less frequently on the mouthparts and were shed over 25 times as rapidly as those on the feet. Many more bumble bees moved between clones than did other possible diurnal pollinators, largely a result of being several times more abundant than all other visitors combined. This factor, plus their heavy pollinia load, suggests that they were the most important diurnal pollinators of these clones.

Entities:  

Year:  1982        PMID: 28311108     DOI: 10.1007/BF00545662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

1.  Pollen carryover, nectar rewards, and pollinator behavior with special reference to Diervilla lonicera.

Authors:  James D Thomson; R C Plowright
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  POLLINATOR FORAGING BEHAVIOR AND GENE DISPERSAL IN SENECIO (COMPOSITAE).

Authors:  Johanna Schmitt
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  PHLOX AND COLIAS: THE EFFICIENCY OF A POLLINATION SYSTEM.

Authors:  Donald A Levin; Denis E Berube
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Resource partitioning in bumble bees: the role of behavioral factors.

Authors:  D H Morse
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-08-12       Impact factor: 47.728

  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  Reproductive success and foraging of the crab spider Misumena vatia.

Authors:  Robert S Fritz; Douglass H Morse
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Flower visitation and pollination efficiency of some North European butterflies.

Authors:  Ola Jennersten
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Contributions of diurnal and nocturnal insects to the pollination of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.) in a pollen-limited system.

Authors:  Douglass H Morse; Robert S Fritz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Nectar production rates of Asclepias quadrifolia: causes and consequences of individual variation.

Authors:  John M Pleasants; Stephen J Chaplin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Honey bees are the dominant diurnal pollinator of native milkweed in a large urban park.

Authors:  James Scott MacIvor; Adriano N Roberto; Darwin S Sodhi; Thomas M Onuferko; Marc W Cadotte
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-10       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.