Literature DB >> 28311106

Foraging strategies and prey switching in the California sea otter.

Richard S Ostfeld1.   

Abstract

Southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis), in recovering from near extinction, are gradually extending their range to include areas from which they have been absent for more than one hundred years. This study took advantage of the otters' relatively sudden arrival in the area near Santa Cruz, California, to monitor their prey selection in the first two years of residence there. Foraging observations revealed that sea urchins (Strongly-locentrotus franciscanus) were heavily preyed upon initially, but virtually disappeared from the diet after one year of sea otter residence. The disappearance of sea urchins was accompanied by an increased use of kelp crabs (Pugettia producta) and the appearance of clams (Gari californica) in the otters' diet. Abalones (Haliotis rufescens) and cancer crabs (Cancer spp.) remained fairly stable as dietary items throughout the two year period. An electivity index was used to quantify sea otter preferences, which corresponded closely with a ranking scheme based on energy intake/unit foraging time calculated for each major prey species. As predicted by optimal foraging theory, sea otters prefer food species of high rank and replace depleted dietary items with those of next highest rank. The process of dietary switching was analyzed with respect to foraging success rates, and it appears that poor success rates, associated with predation on an increasingly rarer prey species (sea urchins), drive sea otters to hunt for different prey. Both patch selection and search image formation appear to function in this process. The potential effects on community structure and stability of predators exhibiting a preference for the most profitable prey are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  1982        PMID: 28311106     DOI: 10.1007/BF00545660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  2 in total

1.  Aleuts, sea otters, and alternate stable-state communities.

Authors:  C A Simenstad; J A Estes; K W Kenyon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-04-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Sea otters: their role in structuring nearshore communities.

Authors:  J A Estes; J F Palmisano
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-20       Impact factor: 47.728

  2 in total
  8 in total

1.  Prey selection by thaidid gastropods: some observational and experimental field tests of foraging models.

Authors:  A Richard Palmer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Increased olfactory search costs change foraging behaviour in an alien mustelid: a precursor to prey switching?

Authors:  Catherine J Price; Peter B Banks
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Sudden collapse of a mesopredator reveals its complementary role in mediating rocky reef regime shifts.

Authors:  Jenn M Burt; M Tim Tinker; Daniel K Okamoto; Kyle W Demes; Keith Holmes; Anne K Salomon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Testing the nutritional-limitation, predator-avoidance, and storm-avoidance hypotheses for restricted sea otter habitat use in the Aleutian Islands, Alaska.

Authors:  Nathan L Stewart; Brenda Konar; M Tim Tinker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Archaeological and Contemporary Evidence Indicates Low Sea Otter Prevalence on the Pacific Northwest Coast During the Late Holocene.

Authors:  Erin Slade; Iain McKechnie; Anne K Salomon
Journal:  Ecosystems       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  The interaction of intraspecific competition and habitat on individual diet specialization: a near range-wide examination of sea otters.

Authors:  Seth D Newsome; M Tim Tinker; Verena A Gill; Zachary N Hoyt; Angela Doroff; Linda Nichol; James L Bodkin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Sea otters homogenize mussel beds and reduce habitat provisioning in a rocky intertidal ecosystem.

Authors:  Gerald G Singh; Russell W Markel; Rebecca G Martone; Anne K Salomon; Christopher D G Harley; Kai M A Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Divergent Skull Morphology Supports Two Trophic Specializations in Otters (Lutrinae).

Authors:  Lori L Timm-Davis; Thomas J DeWitt; Christopher D Marshall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.