Literature DB >> 28310895

Spatial arrangement and diet overlap between colonies of desert ants.

Randall T Ryti1, Ted J Case1.   

Abstract

The spatial patterns and diets of three desert ant species were examined. The results indicate that food competition may account for the spatial arrangement of these species, and that only intraspecific interactions may be required. Each ant species was significantly overdispersed, and the average intraspecific nearest neighbor distances were greater than the interspecific nearest neighbor distances. A test of pairwise spatial arrangment showed that all three species pairs were aggregated interspecifically. The level of the interspecific aggregation was related to the diet similarity of the species. The two species pairs with the lowest diet overlaps were significantly aggregated, and the species pair with the most similar diets was not significantly aggregated. Pairwise dietary overlaps between colonies showed that average intraspecific overlaps were significantly greater than interspecific diet overlaps. Furthermore, the diet overlap was significantly positively correlated to the mean nearest neighbor distance for the three intraspecific and three interspecific comparisons. These data indicate competition for food, especially within species, may be regulating the intercolony distances of these ant species. A computer simulation tested whether only intraspecific territoriality is necessary to produce the observed nearest neighbor distances. A simulation that placed colonies randomly on a patch confirmed that these colonies are intraspecifically overdispersed. By adding intraspecific territoriality, the simulation nearest neighbor distances fit the empirical data reasonably well. Thus interspecific competitive interactions seem unnecessary to account for the spatial arrangement of these species.

Entities:  

Year:  1984        PMID: 28310895     DOI: 10.1007/BF00384274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  1 in total

1.  Niche overlap and diffuse competition.

Authors:  E R Pianka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 11.205

  1 in total
  9 in total

1.  Patterns of coexistence in sexual and asexual species of Cnemidophorus lizards.

Authors:  T J Case
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Experimental small-scale grassland fragmentation alters competitive interactions among ant species.

Authors:  Brigitte Braschler; Bruno Baur
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Density- and size-dependent spacing of ant nests: evidence for intraspecific competition.

Authors:  J Hall Cushman; Gregory D Martinsen; Anthony I Mazeroll
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Soil texture as an influence on the distribution of the desert seed-harvester ants Pogonomyrmex rugosus and Messor pergandei.

Authors:  Robert A Johnson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Dietary similarity and foraging range of two seed-harvester ants during resource fluctuations.

Authors:  S W Rissing
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Overdispersion of ant colonies: a test of hypotheses.

Authors:  Randall T Ryti; Ted J Case
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The regeneration niche of desert ants: effects of established colonies.

Authors:  Randall T Ryti; Ted J Case
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Interactive disturbance effects of two disparate ecosystem engineers in North American shortgrass steppe.

Authors:  Christina Alba-Lynn; James K Detling
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Polydomy in the ant Ectatomma opaciventre.

Authors:  Viviane C Tofolo; Edilberto Giannotti; Erika F Neves; Luis H C Andrade; Sandro M Lima; Yzel R Súarez; William F Antonialli-Junior
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 1.857

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.