Literature DB >> 28310325

Diversity, diversity indices and tropical cockroaches.

Henk Wolda1.   

Abstract

The diversity of samples of cockroaches (Blattaria) taken with light-traps in six localities in Panama is described. As a diversity index α of the log series is found to be more satisfactory than either N 2 or N 1 of Hills's series or Hurlbert's S m, even if the distribution of the relative abundances is significantly different from a log series. However, even the α-index is of only limited usefulness. A simple statistic such as the number of species per unit effort can be at least as useful. The seasonal variation in the value of the diversity indices is negatively correlated with both the number of species and the number of individuals. Mountain sites have a lower alpha-diversity than lowland sites and relatively undisturbed sites have more individuals and more species than disturbed ones, although this difference is not reflected in the value of the diversity indices. To describe the beta-diversity the NESS similarity index, here called C m, is far superior over any other indices available. The between site diversity is very high. Samples taken at the same site in successive years in most cases are significantly different from being random samples of the same fauna.

Year:  1983        PMID: 28310325     DOI: 10.1007/BF00385226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

1.  Similarity indices, sample size and diversity.

Authors:  Henk Wolda
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  A similarity measure sensitive to the contribution of rare species and its use in investigation of variation in marine benthic communities.

Authors:  J Frederick Grassle; Woollcott Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Measures of ecological association.

Authors:  Svante Janson; Jan Vegelius
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Diversity indices: which ones are admissible?

Authors:  R D Routledge
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1979-02-21       Impact factor: 2.691

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Biodiversity of Minnesota caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera): delineation and characterization of regions.

Authors:  David C Houghton
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Trends in abundance of tropical forest insects.

Authors:  Henk Wolda
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  An undersirable property of Hill's diversity indexN 2.

Authors:  R Gadagkar
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Nectar sugar composition and volumes of 47 species of Gentianales from a southern Ecuadorian montane forest.

Authors:  Doris Wolff
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Receding water line and interspecific competition determines plant community composition and diversity in wetlands in Beijing.

Authors:  Zhengjun Wang; Huili Gong; Jing Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Diversity and Distribution Patterns of Cetaceans in the Subtropical Southwestern Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf and Slope.

Authors:  Juliana Couto Di Tullio; Tiago B R Gandra; Alexandre N Zerbini; Eduardo R Secchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.