Literature DB >> 28309828

Changes in fecundity of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans in response to selection for competitive ability.

Ronald B Aiken1, David L Gibo1.   

Abstract

1. Equal numbers of the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans were allowed to compete in population cages. Two sets of 5 cages each-A & B-took 20 and 26 weeks respectively until D. simulans comprised less than 15% of the population for 2 successive generations. 2. At the beginning of each cage set, the fecundity of stock females of each species in the presence of con-& heterospecific females, con- and heterospecific larvae, distilled water and a water soluble extract from larvainfested media were determined. Fecundities of daughters of the last generation to be in competition were tested under the same conditions. 3. In all conditions, D. melanogaster stock females had a higher fecundity than D. simulans females at the beginning of each cage set. After competition, the fecundity of both species changes (generally increased) although that of D. simulans increased to a greater degree. 4. In test of the water-soluble extract of previously used media, females of both species showed decreased fecundity. This indicates that females can determine whether a food source has been used by larvae even when no larvae are immediately observable.

Entities:  

Year:  1979        PMID: 28309828     DOI: 10.1007/BF00346673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  The relation between density regulation and natural selection.

Authors:  J B HALDANE
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1956-07-24

2.  Competition Between Drosophila Melanogaster and Drosophila Simulans: II. The Improvement of Competitive Ability Through Selection.

Authors:  J A Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1952-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Inheritance of Egg Size in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  D C Warren
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1924-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Evolution of Fitness. IV. Genetic Evolution of Interspecific Competitive Ability in Drosophila.

Authors:  F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The ecological determinants of population growth in a Drosophila culture; larval and pupal survival.

Authors:  J H SANG
Journal:  Physiol Zool       Date:  1949-07

6.  RAPID EVOLUTION OF COMPETITIVE ABILITY IN LARVAL MIXTURES OF THE HOUSEFLY.

Authors:  Edwin H Bryant; Carl R Turner
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Interspecific competition betweenDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans : Reduction in fecundity and destruction of eggs when the medium is inhabited by larvae.

Authors:  J J Moth; J S F Barker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The effect of larval interaction on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. 3. Effects of biotic residues.

Authors:  M M Dawood; M W Strickberger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A stablizing interaction between the founder effect and interdeme mixing in competing populations of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  D L Gibo
Journal:  Can J Zool       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 1.597

10.  The comparative evolutionary biology of the sibling species, Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  P A Parsons
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 4.875

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.