Literature DB >> 28309374

The importance of predation and competition in organizing the intertidal epifaunal communities of Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey.

Charles H Peterson1.   

Abstract

Community organization was studied by experiment and observation from October 1972-October 1974 in the marine epifaunal assemblages at each end of Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey. The rock jetty at the wave-exposed eastern end of the inlet possesses an intertidal community with the following attributes: (1) a high intertidal zone dominated by the barnacle, Balanus balanoides, but also occupied by the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis, in rock crevices, (2) a mid and low intertidal zone with usually <10% free space and extreme numerical dominance by Mytilus edulis (usually >85% cover) during summer and fall, and (3) almost no intertidal predators or herbivores. The predatory seastar, Asterias forbesi, is abundant subtidally. Controlled removal experiments indicate that in the mid and low intertidal underlying barnacles perish as a consequence of the establishmentof extensive secondary cover by Mytilus, probably because Mytilus outcompetes Balanus through suffocation or starvation. Mytilus transplants demonstrate that the mussels do not survive outside of crevices in the high intertidal, which thus may represent for Balanus a refuge from competition by Mytilus.The pilings on docks at the protected western end of Barnegat Inlet possess an intertidal epifaunal community with the following characteristics: (1) a high intertidal zone that includes Balanus balanoides, a second barnacle, Balanus eburneus, and an herbivorous gastropod, Littorina littorea, (2) a mid and low intertidal zone with usually >40% free space in the summer and fall and the remaining area covered by several abundant species with no extreme dominant, and (3) abundant predators, chiefly the oyster drill, Urosalpinx cinerea, the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus, and a mud crab, Neopanope texana sayi. Asterias forbesi, while abundant subtidally, is also occasionally present on intertidal surfaces. Controlled exclusion of predators by caging several replicate pilings at the western end of the inlet reveals that predation prevents monopolization of mid and low intertidal space by the apparent competitive dominant, Mytilus. Predation appears to be a direct cause of the relatively great temporal and spatial heterogeneity in the mid and low intertidal of these pilings.Thus, although the Barnegat Inlet intertidal system appears to follow closely the patterns of community organization described for several other rocky intertidal coastlines, this organizational pattern is noteworthy because it is repeated here in a far more seasonal environment and with a new cast of interacting competitors and predators. That crabs play an important role as predators is novel for North America, but only perhaps because all previous North American studies have ignored the rocky intertidal zones of quiet, estuarine waters where in Europe predatory crabs are known to be extremely significant.

Entities:  

Year:  1979        PMID: 28309374     DOI: 10.1007/BF00345993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  3 in total

1.  Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure.

Authors:  S A Levin; R T Paine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Intertidal community structure : Experimental studies on the relationship between a dominant competitor and its principal predator.

Authors:  R T Paine
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The ecology of Mytilus edulis L. (Lamellibranchiata) on exposed rocky shores : II. Growth and mortality.

Authors:  R Seed
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 3.225

  3 in total
  9 in total

1.  Components of predation intensity in the low zone of the New England rocky intertidal region.

Authors:  Bruce A Menge
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The apparent diet of predators and biases due to different handling times of their prey.

Authors:  P G Fairweather; A J Underwood
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Competition among the pioneers in a seasonal soft-bottom benthic succession: field experiments and analysis of the Gilpin-Ayala competition model.

Authors:  Eugene D Gallagher; G B Gardner; Peter A Jumars
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Direct and indirect effects of predation, herbivory and surface rugosity on mussel recruitment.

Authors:  Peter S Petraitis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Development in an estuarine fouling community: The influence of early colonists on later arrivals.

Authors:  T A Dean; L E Hurd
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Competition between two stream dwelling filter-feeders, Hydropsyche oslari and Simulium virgatum.

Authors:  Nina Hemphill
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Population dynamics of the ribbed mussel, Geukensia demissa: The costs and benefits of an aggregated distribution.

Authors:  Mark D Bertness; Edwin Grosholz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Effects of the starfish Patiria miniata on the distribution of the sea urchin Lytechinus anamesus in a southern Californian kelp forest.

Authors:  Stephen C Schroeter; John Dixon; Jon Kastendiek
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Marine reserves demonstrate trophic interactions across habitats.

Authors:  Timothy J Langlois; Marti J Anderson; Russell C Babcock; Shin Kato
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 3.225

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.