Literature DB >> 28309371

The distribution of standing crop of nectar: what does it really tell us?

John M Pleasants1,2, Michael Zimmerman1,2.   

Abstract

Brink (1982) characterizes the distribution of standing crop of nectar for Delphinium nelsonii as bonanzablank, based on comparison with a Poisson. He then discusses possible effects of standing crop variability on pollinator foraging behavior. We disagree with the use of the Poisson and the resulting conclusions. The expected distribution should not be based on doling out random amounts of nectar to flowers, but based on random return times to flowers by pollinators (elapsed time=nectar accumulated). When this model is used, standing crop variance does not differ markedly from expectation. What differences do exist can be accounted for by variability in nectar production rates of individual plants. We also take issue with the use of the bonanza-blank terminology. As originally formulated this refers to nectar production differences within a plant rather than standing crop differences among plants.

Year:  1983        PMID: 28309371     DOI: 10.1007/BF00377188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  A bonanza-blank pollinator reward schedule in Delphinium nelsonii (Ranunculaceae).

Authors:  Don Brink
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Optimal foraging in bumblebees and coevolution with their plants.

Authors:  Graham H Pyke
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Patchiness in the dispersion of nectar resources: Evidence for hot and cold spots.

Authors:  John M Pleasants; Michael Zimmerman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Nectar production rates of Asclepias quadrifolia: causes and consequences of individual variation.

Authors:  John M Pleasants; Stephen J Chaplin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Optimal foraging: movement patterns of bumblebees between inflorescences.

Authors:  G H Pyke
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.570

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Dynamics of forager arrivals and nectar renewal in flowers of Anchusa strigosa.

Authors:  Ronen Kadmon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Effects of recent experience on foraging decisions by bumble bees.

Authors:  Reuven Dukas; Leslie A Real
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Remote perception of floral nectar by bumblebees.

Authors:  James H Marden
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  An estimate of pollen carryover by ants in a natural population of Scleranthus perennis L. (Caryophyllaceae).

Authors:  Linus Svensson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Label-based expectations affect incentive contrast effects in bumblebees.

Authors:  Claire T Hemingway; Felicity Muth
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.812

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.