Literature DB >> 28309286

Habitat choice in natural populations of Drosophila.

Charles E Taylor1, Jeffrey R Powell2.   

Abstract

Mark-release-recapture experiments performed with natural populations of Drosophila at Mather, California show that flies tend to return to their area of original capture or an area ecologically similar to it. Such habitat choice explains the microgeographic genetic differentiation we observed in the population. This behavioral difference between the flies may have a genetic component or may be environmentally induced. Either way, the results help explain how high levels of genetic variation are maintained by natural selection in these species.

Entities:  

Year:  1978        PMID： 28309286     DOI： 10.1007/BF00349992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN： 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  Genetics of natural populations, XLIII. Further studies on rates of dispersal of Drosophila pseudoobscura and its relatives.

Authors:  J R Powell; T Dobzhansky; J E Hook; H E Wistrand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1976-03-25       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic variation in heterogeneous environments.

Authors:  C E Taylor
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Microgeographic differentiation of chromosomal and enzyme polymorphisms in Drosophila persimilis.

Authors:  C E Taylor; J R Powell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  POPULATION GENETICS OF MEXICAN DROSOPHILA VI. CYTOGENETIC ASPECTS OF THE INVERSION POLYMORPHISM IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA.

Authors:  O Olvera; J R Powell; M E de la Rosa; V M Salceda; M I Gaso; J Guzman; W W Anderson; L Levine
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  A GENERAL MODEL TO ACCOUNT FOR ENZYME VARIATION IN NATURAL POPULATIONS. III. MULTIPLE ALLELES.

Authors:  John H Gillespie
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Allozymes as diagnostic characters of sibling species of Drosophila.

Authors:  F J Ayala; J R Powell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Application of method of small parameters to multi-niche population genetic models.

Authors:  S Karlin; J McGregor
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 1.570

8.  Heterosis as an explanation for large amounts of genic polymorphism.

Authors:  R C Lewontin; L R Ginzburg; S D Tuljapurkar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Rates of dispersal of Drosophila pseudoobscura and its relatives.

Authors:  T Dobzhansky; J R Powell
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1974-11-05

10.  Genetic heterogeneity within electrophoretic "alleles" of xanthine dehydrogenase in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  R S Singh; R C Lewontin; A A Felton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 4.562
View more
  10 in total

1.  Genetic variation at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster in relation to environmental variation: Ethanol levels in breeding sites and allozyme frequencies.

Authors:  J B Gibson; T W May; A V Wilks
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Effects of starvation and experience on the response of Drosophila to alternative resources.

Authors:  Michael Turelli; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Habitat choice by Drosophila pseudoobscura: the roles of genotype and of experience.

Authors:  C E Taylor
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Enzyme polymorphism associated with habitat choice in the intertidal snail Tegula funebralis.

Authors:  B A Byers
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Genetic variation for anemotaxis (wind-directed movement) in laboratory and wild-caught populations of Drosophilia.

Authors:  J S Johnston
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  Sexual isolation among isofemale strains within a population of Drosophila immigrans.

Authors:  L Ehrman; P A Parsons
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Sexual isolation among widely distributed populations of Drosophila immigrans.

Authors:  L Ehrman; P A Parsons
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Adaptive strategies in natural populations of Drosophila : Ethanol tolerance, desiccation resistance, and development times in climatically optimal and extreme environments.

Authors:  P A Parsons
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Divergent sensory investment mirrors potential speciation via niche partitioning across Drosophila.

Authors:  Markus Knaden; Bill S Hansson; Ian W Keesey; Veit Grabe
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Does learning or instinct shape habitat selection?

Authors:  Scott E Nielsen; Aaron B A Shafer; Mark S Boyce; Gordon B Stenhouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.