Literature DB >> 28309235

The role of burrowing sponges in bioerosion.

Klaus Rützler1.   

Abstract

Among the large number of limestone-eroding organisms, sponges, mainly of the family Clinonidae are of special interest because of their efficient means of substratum penetration by cellular etching and because they release characteristically shaped calcium carbonate chips which can be detected in the mud-size fraction of many sediments. Identifiable trace fossils and sediments are of great ecological and paleoecological significance.As new data on the excavating mechanism have become available, the questions of burrowing rates and sediment production have gained importance. Extrapolation from shortterm experiments (under 6 months) on substrate invasion are inconclusive because of high initial penetration rates resulting from mechanical stimulation and lack of competition. New experiments show that the rate curve flattens after 6 months and that optimum longterm erosion of CaCO3 does not exceed 700 mg m-2 year-1 (Cliona lampa and C. aprica). Substrate limitations and competition will further reduce this rate.By monitoring the production of CaCO3 chips by Cliona lampa, it was possible to link activity patterns to certain environmental factors. Mechanical stimuli, high light intensity, strong currents and, possibly, low temperature seem to accelerate the burrowing process. Sponge-generated chips can make up over 40% of coral mud when deposited in the current shadow of the reef framework.Using transect counts and sponge area-biomass conversion factors, the mean abundance of burrowing sponges on the Bermuda platform could be calculated. On suitable hard bottom substrates it averages 16 g dry weight per m2. From this value the burrowing potential of sponges can be estimated as 256 g CaCO3 per m2 substrate per year. Since 97-98% of the eroded limestone remains in particulate form, the contribution of fine sediments can amount to 250 g m-2 year-1.Attention is called to the fact that erosion rates by burrowers can not directly be compared with those of borers or scrapers. The former are intermittent and their activities are affected by environmental and biological interactions, while activities of the latter are rather constant and guided by the need for food.

Entities:  

Year:  1975        PMID: 28309235     DOI: 10.1007/BF00345306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  1 in total

1.  Transport of Calcareous Fragments by Reef Fishes.

Authors:  J E Bardach
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-01-13       Impact factor: 47.728

  1 in total
  7 in total

1.  Bioerosion of corals and the influence of damselfish territoriality: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Michael J Risk; Paul W Sammarco
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Allelopathic interaction between a reef coelenterate and benthic algae.

Authors:  R P M Bak; J L A Borsboom
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Distribution, burrowing, and growth rates of the clam Tridacna crocea on interior reef flats : Formation of structures resembling micro atolls.

Authors:  W M Hamner; M S Jones
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Global diversity of sponges (Porifera).

Authors:  Rob W M Van Soest; Nicole Boury-Esnault; Jean Vacelet; Martin Dohrmann; Dirk Erpenbeck; Nicole J De Voogd; Nadiezhda Santodomingo; Bart Vanhoorne; Michelle Kelly; John N A Hooper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Quantification of chemical and mechanical bioerosion rates of six Caribbean excavating sponge species found on the coral reefs of Curaçao.

Authors:  Didier M de Bakker; Alice E Webb; Lisanne A van den Bogaart; Steven M A C van Heuven; Erik H Meesters; Fleur C van Duyl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A Novel μCT Analysis Reveals Different Responses of Bioerosion and Secondary Accretion to Environmental Variability.

Authors:  Nyssa J Silbiger; Òscar Guadayol; Florence I M Thomas; Megan J Donahue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A decadal analysis of bioeroding sponge cover on the inshore Great Barrier Reef.

Authors:  Blake D Ramsby; Mia O Hoogenboom; Steve Whalan; Nicole S Webster; Angus Thompson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.