Literature DB >> 28308691

Photosynthetic response to varying light intensity in ecotypes of Solanum dulcamara L. from shaded and exposed habitats.

E Gauhl1.   

Abstract

Within the widespread species Solanum dulcamara, contrasting ecotypes were found which are physiologically adapted to the light intensities prevailing in their natural habitats. When grown under a high light intensity, an ecotype from a shaded habitat exhibits signs of damage. Another one from an exposed habitat has higher rates of photosynthetic CO2 uptake when grown under strong as compared to weak light and does not show damage. This differential response becomes even more evident when leaves of both ecotypes are grown to maturity under weak light and are subsequently subjected to strong light for some time. The quantum requirement for photosynthesis increases in the shade-, but not in the sun-ecotype. The sun type increases its rate of photosynthesis under saturating light intensities after a few days in strong light.No significant difference in physical resistances to gas diffusion could be found to explain the highly differing rates of photosynthesis. With the increase in photosynthetic capacity in leaves of the sun type, protein content, activity of RuDP carboxylase, and concentration of Fraction I protein increased likewise. It is suggested that de novo synthesis of photosynthetic enzymes in fully expanded leaves of the sun ecotype following treatment with strong light is the cause of its increased capacity for CO2 fixation.

Entities:  

Year:  1976        PMID: 28308691     DOI: 10.1007/BF00344797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  On the inhibition of photosynthesis by intense light.

Authors:  B KOK
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1956-08

2.  COPPER ENZYMES IN ISOLATED CHLOROPLASTS. POLYPHENOLOXIDASE IN BETA VULGARIS.

Authors:  D I Arnon
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1949-01       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.

Authors:  O H LOWRY; N J ROSEBROUGH; A L FARR; R J RANDALL
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Simultaneous measurements on the effect of oxygen concentration on water vapor and carbon dioxide exchange in leaves.

Authors:  E Gauhl; O Björkman
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Isolation, properties, and structure of fraction I protein from Avena sativa L.

Authors:  M W Steer; B E Gunning; T A Graham; D J Carr
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Ribulose diphosphate carboxylase. I. A factor involved in light activation of the enzyme.

Authors:  G F Wildner; R S Criddle
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1969-12-04       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Rate-limiting processes in photosynthesis at saturating light intensities.

Authors:  P F Wareing; M M Khalifa; K J Treharne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-11-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The active species of "CO2" utilized by ribulose diphosphate carboxylase.

Authors:  T G Cooper; D Filmer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1969-02-10       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  [A contribution on chemical differentiation within species of Solanum dulcamara L].

Authors:  K E Rozumek; H Sander
Journal:  Arch Pharm Ber Dtsch Pharm Ges       Date:  1967-04

10.  Effects of Light Intensity on Photosynthetic Carboxylative Phase Enzymes and Chlorophyll Synthesis in Greening Leaves of Hordeum vulgare L.

Authors:  R C Huffaker; R L Obendorf; C J Keller; G E Kleinkopf
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1966-06       Impact factor: 8.340

View more
  18 in total

1.  Effect of irradiance during growth of Glycine max on photosynthetic capacity and percent activation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase.

Authors:  R S Torisky; J C Servaites
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Photosynthetic adaptation ofSolanum dulcamara L. to sun and shade environments. III. Characterization of genotypes with differing photosynthetic performance.

Authors:  J M Clough; R S Alberte; J A Teeri
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Photosynthetic adaptation of Solanum dulcamara L. to sun and shade Environments : IV. A comparison of North American and European genotypes.

Authors:  J M Clough; J A Teeri; S J Tonsor
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Reduced photoinhibition with stem curling in the resurrection plant Selaginella lepidophylla.

Authors:  Jefferson G Lebkuecher; William G Eickmeier
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Photosynthetic adaptation of Solanum dulcamara L. to sun and shade environments : I. A Comparison of Sun and Shade Populations.

Authors:  J M Clough; J A Teeri; R S Alberte
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Interactions between irradiance, nitrogen nutrition, and water stress in the sun-shade responses of Solanum dulcamara.

Authors:  C B Osmond
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Photosynthetic characteristics of a tropical forest understory herb, Alocasia macrorrhiza, and a related crop species, Colocasia esculenta grown in contrasting light environments.

Authors:  Daniel A Sims; Robert W Pearcy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Photosynthetic light acclimation in two rainforest Piper species with different ecological amplitudes.

Authors:  M B Walters; C B Field
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Leaf age and seasonal effects on light, water, and nitrogen use efficiency in a California shrub.

Authors:  C Field; H A Mooney
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Nitrogen supply as a factor influencing photoinhibition and photosynthetic acclimation after transfer of shade-grown Solanum dulcamara to bright light.

Authors:  P J Ferrar; C B Osmond
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.