Literature DB >> 28308476

Different nest predator faunas and nest predation risk on ground and shrub nests at forest ecotones: an experiment and a review.

Bo Söderström1, Tomas Pärt1, Johan Rydén1.   

Abstract

This study examined predator faunas of artificial ground and shrub nests and whether nest predation risk was influenced by nest site, proximity to forest edge, and habitat structure in 38 grassland plots in south-central Sweden. There was a clear separation of predator faunas between shrub and ground nests as identified from marks in plasticine eggs. Corvids accounted for almost all predation on shrub nests whereas mammals mainly depredated ground nests. Nest predation risk was significantly greater for shrub than for ground nests at all distances (i.e. 0, 15 and 30 m) from the forest edge. However, nest predation risk was not significantly related to distance to forest edge, but significantly increased with decreasing distance to the nearest tree. Different corvid species robbed nests at different distances from the forest edge, with jays robbing nests closest to edges. We conclude that the relationship between the predation risk of grassland bird nests and distance to the forest edge mainly depends on the relative importance of different nest predator species and on the structure of the forest edge zone. A review of published articles on artificial shrub and ground nest predation in the temperate zone corroborated the results of our own study, namely that shrub nests experienced higher rates of depredation in open habitats close to the forest edge and that avian predators predominantly robbed shrub nests. Furthermore, the review results showed that predation rates on nests in general are highest <50 m inside the forest and lower in open as well as forest interior habitats (≥50 m from the edge).

Keywords:  Artificial-nest predation; Birds; Hard and soft edges; Key words Farmland; Nest site

Year:  1998        PMID: 28308476     DOI: 10.1007/s004420050638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Habitat fragmentation reduces nest survival in an Afrotropical bird community in a biodiversity hotspot.

Authors:  William D Newmark; Thomas R Stanley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Contrast in edge vegetation structure modifies the predation risk of natural ground nests in an agricultural landscape.

Authors:  Nicole A Schneider; Matthew Low; Debora Arlt; Tomas Pärt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Are predation rates comparable between natural and artificial open-cup tree nests in boreal forest landscapes?

Authors:  Katrine S Hoset; Magne Husby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  No evidence for spatial variation in predation risk following restricted-area fox culling.

Authors:  Jim-Lino Kämmerle; Sarah Niekrenz; Ilse Storch
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.964

5.  Breeding phenology of birds: mechanisms underlying seasonal declines in the risk of nest predation.

Authors:  Kathi L Borgmann; Courtney J Conway; Michael L Morrison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Species Traits Drive Long-Term Population Trends of Common Breeding Birds in Northern Italy.

Authors:  Pietro Tirozzi; Valerio Orioli; Olivia Dondina; Leila Kataoka; Luciano Bani
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.