Literature DB >> 28308330

Geographic and population variation in pollinating seed-consuming interactions between senita cacti (Lophocereus schottii) and senita moths (Upiga virescens).

J N Holland1, Theodore H Fleming1.   

Abstract

Interspecific interactions can vary within and among populations and geographic locations. This variation can subsequently influence the evolution and coevolution of species interactions. We investigated population and geographic variation in traits important to pollinating seed-consuming interactions between the senita cactus (Lophocereus schottii) and its obligate pollinating moth (Upiga virescens), both of which are geographically restricted to the Sonoran Desert. Female moths actively pollinate senita flowers and oviposit onto flowers. Their larvae consume developing seeds and fruit of flowers pollinated by females. Traits important to this interaction include fruit set from moth pollination, fruit survivorship, and costs of fruit consumption by larvae. We studied these traits for five populations at two widely separated geographic locations. On average, 37% of flowers set fruit, 22% of flowers produced mature fruit, and larvae consumed 25% of immature fruit pollinated by female senita moths. Senita cactus and senita moth interactions were strongly mutualistic in all populations that we studied. Although one population had statistically lower fruit set and fruit production than the other four, all five populations were qualitatively similar in fruit production, costs, and patterns of fruit survivorship. Hand-pollination experiments suggested that fruit set was resource-limited in all but this one population. Apparent pollen limitation in the one population explains the quantitative differences in fruit set and fruit survivorship among the populations. As predicted by theory and exemplified by the senita mutualism, specialized and/or obligate interactions vary little among populations and geographic locations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fruit set; Interaction outcome; Key words Mutualism; Pollination; Senita

Year:  1999        PMID: 28308330     DOI: 10.1007/s004420050945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

1.  Spatio-temporal arrangement of Chamaerops humilis inflorescences and occupancy patterns by its nursery pollinator, Derelomus chamaeropsis.

Authors:  M E Jácome-Flores; Miguel Delibes; Thorsten Wiegand; José M Fedriani
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Geographic and within-population variation in the globeflower-globeflower fly interaction: the costs and benefits of rearing pollinators' larvae.

Authors:  Laurence Després; Sébastien Ibanez; Asa M Hemborg; Bernard Godelle
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Geographical and within-population variation in the globeflower-globeflower fly interaction: the costs and benefits of rearing pollinator's larvae.

Authors:  Laurence Després; Sébastien Ibanez; Asa M Hemborg; Bernard Godelle
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Variation in the reproductive performance of the Trollius-Chiastocheta mutualism at the edge of its range in north-east Germany.

Authors:  Tristan Lemke; Stefan Porembski
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.225

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.