Literature DB >> 28308314

Pond tadpoles with generalized morphology: is it time to reconsider their functional roles in aquatic communities?

James W Petranka1, Caroline A Kennedy1.   

Abstract

With rare exceptions, anuran larvae have traditionally been considered to occupy lower trophic levels in aquatic communities where they function as microphagous suspension feeders. This view is being challenged by studies showing that tadpoles with generalized morphology often function as macrophagous predators. Here, we review the literature concerning macrophagy by tadpoles and provide two additional examples involving generalized tadpoles. In the first, we demonstrate with laboratory and field experiments that wood frog (Rana sylvatica) tadpoles are major predators of macroinvertebrates in ponds. In the second, we show that green frog (R. clamitans) tadpoles can cause catastrophic reproductive failure of the wood frog via egg predation. These results and data from other studies challenge the assumption that generalized tadpoles function as filter-feeding omnivores, and question the general applicability of community organization models which assume that predation risk increases with pond permanence. We suggest that predation risk is greater in temporary ponds than in more permanent ponds for many organisms that are vulnerable to predation by tadpoles. This being so, a conditional model based upon interactions that are species-specific, life-stage-specific, and context-dependent may better explain community organization along hydrological gradients than models which assume that temporary ponds have few or no predators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hydrological gradients; Key words Community organization; Macrophagy; Predatory tadpoles; Rana

Year:  1999        PMID: 28308314     DOI: 10.1007/s004420050898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  3 in total

1.  Density of an intraguild predator mediates feeding group size, intraguild egg predation, and intra- and interspecific competition.

Authors:  Louise A Burley; Anna T Moyer; James W Petranka
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Using the 2020 global pandemic as a springboard to highlight the need for amphibian conservation in eastern Asia.

Authors:  Amaël Borzée; Jos Kielgast; Sally Wren; Ariadne Angulo; Shu Chen; Kit Magellan; Kevin R Messenger; Candace M Hansen-Hendrikx; Anne Baker; Marcileida M Dos Santos; Mirza Kusrini; Jianping Jiang; Irina V Maslova; Indraneil Das; Daesik Park; David Bickford; Robert W Murphy; Jing Che; Tu Van Do; Truong Quang Nguyen; Ming-Feng Chuang; Phillip J Bishop
Journal:  Biol Conserv       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 5.990

3.  Despite Buffers, Experimental Forest Clearcuts Impact Amphibian Body Size and Biomass.

Authors:  Jessica S Veysey Powell; Kimberly J Babbitt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.