Literature DB >> 28308230

The breakdown and decomposition of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) leaf litter in two deciduous woodland soils : I. Breakdown, leaching and decomposition.

J M Anderson1,2.   

Abstract

Weight losses from sweet chestnut and beech leaves, attributable to biotic and abiotic breakdown processes, leaching and microbial decomposition have been studied using tethered leaves and litter bags. The experimental sites were two adjacent areas of deciduous woodland. In one area (the Castanea site) a mor-like moder humus form has developed under a stand dominated by coppiced chestnut, in the other a mull-like moder underlies a stand of coppiced beech (the Fagus site).Chestnut leaves in the Castanea site are primarily comminuted by abiotic processes (wind, rain, hygroscopic movements, etc.) and soil animals make a relatively small contribution to leaf litter breakdown. After 31 months in the field 36.03% of the initial weight of chestnut leaves remained in the fine mesh bags against 22.82% in the coarse mesh bags. Weight losses from the coarse and fine mesh bags containing beech litter were not significantly different after 31 months when a mean weight of 57.10% of the litter remained.In the Fagus site, leaf litter breakdown was mainly due to the feeding activities of earthworms. However, chestnut leaves were more readily selected than beech leaves. After 8 months in the field nearly 45% more chestnut leaf material had been lost from the coarse mesh bags than from the fine mesh bags. Weight losses from the coarse and fine mesh bags containing beech litter were not significantly different after 31 months, when a mean weight of 43.30% of the litter remained.The leaching and decomposition rates of either type of leaves were not significantly different in the two sites. Chestnut leaves in fine mesh bags lost weight at twice the rate of beech leaves under similar conditions during the first 20 months of the study; however, most of the weight losses from beech and up to 75% of the losses from chestnut were attributable to leaching rather than to microbial decomposition. The rates of weight losses from the chestnut litter in fine mesh bags declined over the last year of the study, but beech maintained approximately constant weight loss rates for 31 months in the field. This difference may be due to different rates at which similar proportions of water soluble materials were leached from the leaves.A major defect in the litterbag technique is demonstrated. The litter bags maintain the micro-environmental characteristics of the surface litter layers and do not follow the breakdown and decomposition pattern of the leaf litter year class from which the experimental material was drawn.

Entities:  

Year:  1973        PMID: 28308230     DOI: 10.1007/BF00347566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  2 in total

1.  First-Year Breakdown of Leaf Litter in Southern Appalachian Forests.

Authors:  R E Shanks; J S Olson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The breakdown and decomposition of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa mill.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) leaf litter in two deciduous woodland soils : II. Changes in the carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and polyphenol content.

Authors:  J M Anderson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 3.225

  2 in total
  9 in total

1.  Biological decomposition efficiency in different woodland soils.

Authors:  H Herlitzius
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2. 

Authors:  Rotraud Herlitzius; Hans Herlitzius
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The failure of nitrogen and lignin control of decomposition in a North American desert.

Authors:  Douglas Schaefer; Yosef Steinberger; Walter G Whitford
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Foliage litter turnover and earthworm populations in three beech forests of contrasting soil and vegetation types.

Authors:  H Staaf
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Effects of flooding on leaf litter decomposition in microcosms.

Authors:  Frank P Day
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Decomposition of elephant dung in an arid, tropical environment.

Authors:  J M Anderson; M J Coe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The breakdown and decomposition of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa mill.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) leaf litter in two deciduous woodland soils : II. Changes in the carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and polyphenol content.

Authors:  J M Anderson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Organic residue decomposition: The minicontainer-system a multifunctional tool in decomposition studies.

Authors:  G Eisenbeis; R Lenz; T Heiber
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 9.  Climate and litter quality differently modulate the effects of soil fauna on litter decomposition across biomes.

Authors:  Pablo García-Palacios; Fernando T Maestre; Jens Kattge; Diana H Wall
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 9.492

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.