Literature DB >> 28308169

Overlap in resource use, and interspecific competition.

Peter F Sale1.   

Abstract

When several species co-exist, the amount by which they overlap in their use of resources is a measure of their similarity to one another. As such, resource overlap does not measure the amount of competition among them. When the resources are not limiting to population growth, patterns of resource use may overlap to any degree. However, when the species are frequently in competition for their resources, natural selection will favor the separation of their requirements, and the amount of resource overlap will be reduced.This paper presents a technique which permits comparison of the amount of resource overlap observed in a given case with that expected for a group of similar species co-existing in the absence of competitive interactions. From this comparison can be evaluated the likelihood of competitive processes being important in the situation under study.

Year:  1974        PMID: 28308169     DOI: 10.1007/BF00344924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

1.  Species packing, and what competition minimizes.

Authors:  R M Arthur
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Ecological consequences of island colonization by southwest pacific birds, I. Types of niche shifts.

Authors:  J M Diamond
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Dietary overlap of grasshoppers on sandhill rangeland in northeastern Colorado.

Authors:  D N Ueckert; R M Hansen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species.

Authors:  R MacArthur
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 1.570

  4 in total
  13 in total

1.  Microhabitat use by bisexual and unisexual fishes (Poeciliopsis: Poeciliidae) in an artificial stream.

Authors:  Janet Lanza
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Objective recognition of guilds: testing for statistically significant species clusters.

Authors:  F M Jaksić; R G Medel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Habitat partitioning among the mayfly species (Ephemeroptera) of Yuccabine Creek, a tropical Australian stream.

Authors:  M N Hearnden; R G Pearson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Predictions of species interactions from consumer-resource theory: experimental tests with grasshoppers and plants.

Authors:  Mark E Ritchie; David Tilman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Specialization and noncompetitive resource partitioning among sponge-eating dorid nudibranchs.

Authors:  Stephen A Bloom
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Feeding patterns in grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae): Factors influencing diet specialization.

Authors:  Anthony Joern
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Niche relations among dung-inhabiting beetles.

Authors:  I Hanski; H Koskela
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  A test of a competition model with reference to three species of small mammals in south-eastern Australia.

Authors:  C R Dickman; D P Woodside
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The basis of niche separation during terrestrial life between two species of toad (Bufo bufo and Bufo calamita): competition or specialisation?

Authors:  Jonathan S Denton; Trevor J C Beebee
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Variation in surfperch diets between allopatry and sympatry: circumstantial evidence for competition.

Authors:  Russell J Schmitt; James A Coyer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.