Literature DB >> 28308039

An evaluation of randomization models for nested species subsets analysis.

Rosamonde R Cook1, James F Quinn1.   

Abstract

Randomization models, often termed "null" models, have been widely used since the 1970s in studies of species community and biogeographic patterns. More recently they have been used to test for nested species subset patterns (or nestedness) among assemblages of species occupying spatially subdivided habitats, such as island archipelagoes and terrestrial habitat patches. Nestedness occurs when the species occupying small or species-poor sites have a strong tendency to form proper subsets of richer species assemblages. In this paper, we examine the ability of several published simulation models to detect, in an unbiased way, nested subset patterns from a simple matrix of site-by-species presence-absence data. Each approach attempts to build in biological realism by following the assumption that the ecological processes that generated the patterns observed in nature would, if they could be repeated many times over using the same species and landscape configuration, produce islands with the same number of species and species present on the same number of islands as observed. In mathematical terms, the mean marginal totals (column and row sums) of many simulated matrices would match those of the observed matrix. Results of model simulations suggest that the true probability of a species occupying any given site cannot be estimated unambiguously. Nearly all of the models tested were shown to bias simulation matrices toward low levels of nestedness, increasing the probability of a Type I statistical error. Further, desired marginal totals could be obtained only through ad-hoc manipulation of the calculated probabilities. Paradoxically, when such results are achieved, the model is shown to have little statistical power to detect nestedness. This is because nestedness is determined largely by the marginal totals of the matrix themselves, as suggested earlier by Wright and Reeves. We conclude that at the present time, the best null model for nested subset patterns may be one based on equal probabilities of occurrence for all species. Examples of such models are readily available in the literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Island biogeography; Key words Nested subsets; Patch dynamics; Randomization models; Species assemblages

Year:  1998        PMID: 28308039     DOI: 10.1007/s004420050412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Community assembly and invasion: an experimental test of neutral versus niche processes.

Authors:  Joseph Fargione; Cynthia S Brown; David Tilman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Nestedness of north-west European land snail ranges as a consequence of differential immigration from Pleistocene glacial refuges.

Authors:  Bernhard Hausdorf; Christian Hennig
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-02-08       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Toward ecologically explicit null models of nestedness.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Moore; Robert K Swihart
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  A refined methodology for defining plant communities using postagricultural data from the neotropics.

Authors:  Randall W Myster
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-03-12

5.  Unmasking structural patterns in incidence matrices: an application to ecological data.

Authors:  Bernat Bramon Mora; Giulio V Dalla Riva; Daniel B Stouffer
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Nestedness of remnant sonoran desert plant communities in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona.

Authors:  Arthur Stiles; Samuel M Scheiner
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.499

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.