Literature DB >> 28307990

Responses of Acilius sulcatus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) to chemical cues from perch (Perca fluviatilis).

Kajsa Åbjörnsson1, Bálint M A Wagner1, Anna Axelsson1, Rickard Bjerselius2, K Håkan Olsén2.   

Abstract

In this study we tested the hypothesis that the presence of chemical stimuli from a hungry predator would initiate anti-predator responses, while stimuli from a satiated predator would not. We used chemical stimuli released from starved perch (Perca fluviatilis) and from satiated perch (predator). As prey we used adult Acilius sulcatus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). The reaction of the beetles to different predator conditions was tested during daytime. We also tested the reaction to starved perch during the night. A. sulcatus activity decreased when it was exposed to stimuli released from starved perch during daytime when visibility was poor, due to the presence of artificial vegetation. There was, however, no reaction to satiated perch under the same experimental conditions. These results indicate that A. sulcatus can discriminate between chemical cues from hungry and satiated fish predators. When visibility was good and the concentration of chemical cues was constant, the beetles did not react to starved perch in the daytime, but their activity decreased at night in response to stimuli released from starved perch. Visual as well as chemical cues seem to be important for detecting a potential predator. When visibility is good, beetles seem to rely on visual stimuli, while in darkness they seem to use chemical stimuli to detect the presence of predators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Day-night; Hunger; Keywords Chemical cues; Predator avoidance; Satiation

Year:  1997        PMID: 28307990     DOI: 10.1007/s004420050221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cued in: advances and opportunities in freshwater chemical ecology.

Authors:  Romi L Burks; David M Lodge
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Predator faunas past and present: quantifying the influence of waterborne cues in divergent ecotypes of the isopod Asellus aquaticus.

Authors:  Sanna Harris; Kristina Karlsson Green; Lars B Pettersson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effects of degraded optical conditions on behavioural responses to alarm cues in a freshwater fish.

Authors:  Lynn Ranåker; P Anders Nilsson; Christer Brönmark
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The influence of insecticide exposure and environmental stimuli on the movement behaviour and dispersal of a freshwater isopod.

Authors:  Jacqueline Augusiak; Paul J Van den Brink
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Specialization directs habitat selection responses to a top predator in semiaquatic but not aquatic taxa.

Authors:  Hana Šigutová; Filip Harabiš; Martin Šigut; Jiří Vojar; Lukáš Choleva; Aleš Dolný
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Behavioural Responses of Defended and Undefended Prey to Their Predator-A Case Study of Rotifera.

Authors:  Victor Parry; Ulrike E Schlägel; Ralph Tiedemann; Guntram Weithoff
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-13

7.  Smell or vision? The use of different sensory modalities in predator discrimination.

Authors:  Stefan Fischer; Evelyne Oberhummer; Filipa Cunha-Saraiva; Nina Gerber; Barbara Taborsky
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  The Braveheart amphipod: a review of responses of invasive Dikerogammarus villosus to predation signals.

Authors:  Łukasz Jermacz; Jarosław Kobak
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.