Literature DB >> 28307951

Spatial and temporal use of floodplain habitats by lentic and lotic species of aquatic turtles.

J R Bodie1, R D Semlitsch1.   

Abstract

We investigated the use of aquatic and terrestrial floodplain habitats by lentic and lotic turtles inhabiting the Missouri River, a contemporary, regulated large river. Specifically, we tested whether habitats were used differentially by turtle species, sexes, and life stages over biologically determined spatial and temporal scales. We monitored female and male false map turtles (Graptemys pseudogeographica) and slider turtles (Trachemys scripta) for 14 months, using radiotelemetry. In addition, over a 3-year period we trapped G. pseudogeographica (n=591) and T. scripta (n=129) to supplement data on habitat use. Movements based on radiotelemetry and recaptures were summarized for each individual. Both species of turtles displayed dynamic annual activity patterns and used diverse habitats including those typically considered terrestrial. Although G. pseudogeographica and T. scripta spent a substantial portion of the year in the Missouri River (primarily in the cool months), newly created scour habitats also appeared to attract turtles during the cool season. However, in the warm months, habitat use became much more diverse, with turtles occupying all identified habitats including flooded agriculture and forest. Relative to their proportions, slough and scour habitats appeared to be highly favored while forests older than 4 years and agricultural habitats were proportionally less favored. We found few differences between species. However, males of both species were consistently more sedentary, used half as many habitats, and moved half as far from the river as did females, especially during May through July. Juveniles of both species were captured on average farther from the river than were adults, perhaps reflecting the close proximity of both nesting areas and shallow, productive habitats free of aquatic predators. We estimate a riparian zone of 449 m that encompasses 95% of the population movements away from the river and discuss the quality of habitats important to reproduction and survival of lentic and lotic floodplain turtles. These spatial and temporal movement patterns, in light of their potential adaptive costs and benefits to G. pseudogeographica and T. scripta, are critical to understanding the ecology of long-lived vertebrates that depend on contemporary large rivers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Buffer zone; Habitat use; Key words Floodplain; Telemetry; Turtle

Year:  2000        PMID: 28307951     DOI: 10.1007/PL00008830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

Review 1.  Physiological, behavioral, and ecological aspects of migration in reptiles.

Authors:  Amanda Southwood; Larisa Avens
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Identifying Critical Habitat for Australian Freshwater Turtles in a Large Regulated Floodplain: Implications for Environmental Water Management.

Authors:  J F Ocock; G Bino; S Wassens; J Spencer; R F Thomas; R T Kingsford
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Do geographically isolated wetlands influence landscape functions?

Authors:  Matthew J Cohen; Irena F Creed; Laurie Alexander; Nandita B Basu; Aram J K Calhoun; Christopher Craft; Ellen D'Amico; Edward DeKeyser; Laurie Fowler; Heather E Golden; James W Jawitz; Peter Kalla; L Katherine Kirkman; Charles R Lane; Megan Lang; Scott G Leibowitz; David Bruce Lewis; John Marton; Daniel L McLaughlin; David M Mushet; Hadas Raanan-Kiperwas; Mark C Rains; Lora Smith; Susan C Walls
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Performance of GPS units for deployment on semiaquatic animals.

Authors:  Lia Schlippe Justicia; Frank Rosell; Martin Mayer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The influence of a single species on the space use of mixed-species flocks in Amazonian Peru.

Authors:  Sean M Williams; Catherine A Lindell
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.600

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.