Literature DB >> 28307901

Effects of habitat fragmentation on provisioning rates, diet and breeding success in two species of tit (great tit and blue tit).

Nadia Nour1, David Currie1, Erik Matthysen1, Raoul Van Damme1, André A Dhondt1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of forest fragmentation on the ability of parent birds to provide their young with an adequate food supply. To examine whether prey population densities of the great tit (Parus major L.) and the blue tit (P. caeruleus L.) vary between study areas in different forest size classes we compared provisioning rates and chick diet and related these parameters to breeding success. We filmed 217 nests over two breeding seasons and collected data on frass fall as a general estimate of caterpillar availability. Nests which were attended by none or one parent only during filming (n = 46) were excluded from the analyses. In both years and for both species feeding rates were highest in the smallest fragments and lowest in the large forest. There was also a suggestion that differences in feeding rates between areas vary between years. We found no consistent tendency for prey size to change with forest size, although both species brought slightly smaller prey items to the nest in the smallest forest fragments and feeding rates correlated negatively with prey size. Caterpillars were the main item fed to nestlings, in both species. We found no evidence to suggest that either frass fall or the proportion of caterpillars in the diet varied with forest size. There was also no correlation between mean frass fall and the total number of caterpillars brought to the nests, in either species. Breeding success, as measured by clutch size, brood size, fledging weight and fledging success, did not differ between the small fragments and the large forest, in either species. There was also no relationship between provisioning rate (as concerns volume of prey fed to nestlings and the quality of chick diet) and breeding success parameters. In conclusion, this study does not suggest suboptimal foraging or breeding conditions in small fragments compared to a nearby large forest, for either species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breeding success; Diet; Forest size; Key wordsParus spp.; Provisioning

Year:  1998        PMID: 28307901     DOI: 10.1007/s004420050476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  Unpredictable food supply modifies costs of reproduction and hampers individual optimization.

Authors:  János Török; Gergely Hegyi; László Tóth; Réka Könczey
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Seasonal- and sex-specific correlations between dispersal and exploratory behaviour in the great tit.

Authors:  Thijs van Overveld; Vincent Careau; Frank Adriaensen; Erik Matthysen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Family movements before independence influence natal dispersal in a territorial songbird.

Authors:  Erik Matthysen; Thijs Van Overveld; Tom Van de Casteele; Frank Adriaensen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Breeding phenology, provisioning behaviour, and unusual patterns of life history variation across an anthropogenic heterogeneous landscape.

Authors:  William O'Shea; John O'Halloran; John L Quinn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The importance of a main dish: nestling diet and foraging behaviour in Mediterranean blue tits in relation to prey phenology.

Authors:  Vicente García-Navas; Juan José Sanz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Do sibling tits (Parus major, P. caeruleus) disperse over similar distances and in similar directions?

Authors:  E Matthysen; T Van de Casteele; F Adriaensen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Small and large wetland fragments are equally suited breeding sites for a ground-nesting passerine.

Authors:  Gilberto Pasinelli; Christian Mayer; Alexandre Gouskov; Karin Schiegg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Turn taking is not restricted by task specialisation but does not facilitate equality in offspring provisioning.

Authors:  Maaike Griffioen; Arne Iserbyt; Wendt Müller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Spatial and temporal variation in heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratios of nestling passerine birds: comparison of blue tits and great tits.

Authors:  Jerzy Banbura; Joanna Skwarska; Miroslawa Banbura; Michal Gladalski; Magdalena Holysz; Adam Kalinski; Marcin Markowski; Jaroslaw Wawrzyniak; Piotr Zielinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.