Literature DB >> 28307870

Coexistence of white-footed mice and deer mice may be mediated by fluctuating environmental conditions.

Jerry O Wolff1.   

Abstract

White-footed mice, Peromyscus leucopus noveboracensis, and deer mice, P. maniculatus nubiterrae, occur sympatically throughout much of the Appalachian Mountains of the eastern United States. Previous studies have shown that these two species are behaviorally and ecologically similar and do not partition food or microhabitat. In this paper I use a 14-year data set to demonstrate that the two species have differential population growth and survival rates in response to food abundance and season, which may mediate their coexistence. The ratio of white-footed mice to deer mice ranged from 0.5:1 to 6:1. During summer and times of tood abundance, white-footed mice gained a numerical advantage over deer mice in 10 of 14 years, whereas following winter and poor food production, deer mice had higher survival in 9 of 13 years. The major decline in white-foote mice, but not deer mice, was associated with poor mast (acorn) production in autumn. Differential survival of deer mice may be due to their physiological adaptations to cold temperature and efficient use of torpor during food shortage. Inter-year variance in food production and climatic conditions appear to change the competitive advantage of each species often enough to permit coexistence. Coexistence of these two ecologically similar species may be maintained by different physiological limitations in a fluctuating environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coexistence; Mast; Peromyscus leucopus; Peromyscus maniculatus; Torpor

Year:  1996        PMID: 28307870     DOI: 10.1007/BF00333730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  3 in total

1.  Resource partitioning in ecological communities.

Authors:  T W Schoener
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Short-term instabilities and long-term community dynamics.

Authors:  P Chesson; N Huntly
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  On group selection and Wynne-Edwards' hypothesis.

Authors:  J A Wiens
Journal:  Am Sci       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 0.548

  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  Host infection and community composition predict vector burden.

Authors:  Jordan Salomon; Alexandra Lawrence; Arielle Crews; Samantha Sambado; Andrea Swei
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Climate affects the outbreaks of a forest defoliator indirectly through its tree hosts.

Authors:  Kyle J Haynes; Andrew M Liebhold; Jonathan S Lefcheck; Randall S Morin; Guiming Wang
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Analysis of weather effects on variability in Lyme disease incidence in the northeastern United States.

Authors:  Susan Subak
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.132

4.  Pulsed resource availability changes dietary niche breadth and partitioning between generalist rodent consumers.

Authors:  Ryan B Stephens; Erik A Hobbie; Thomas D Lee; Rebecca J Rowe
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Phylogeographic Structure of the White-Footed Mouse and the Deer Mouse, Two Lyme Disease Reservoir Hosts in Québec.

Authors:  Jessica Fiset; Nathalie Tessier; Virginie Millien; Francois-Joseph Lapointe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Interactive range-limit theory (iRLT): An extension for predicting range shifts.

Authors:  Alexej P K Sirén; Toni Lyn Morelli
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Effect of rodent density on tick and tick-borne pathogen populations: consequences for infectious disease risk.

Authors:  Aleksandra I Krawczyk; Gilian L A van Duijvendijk; Arno Swart; Dieter Heylen; Ryanne I Jaarsma; Frans H H Jacobs; Manoj Fonville; Hein Sprong; Willem Takken
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.876

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.