Literature DB >> 28307769

A hydrological tracer study of water uptake depth in a Scots pine forest under two different water regimes.

A H Plamboeck1, H Grip1, U Nygren2.   

Abstract

Little is known about the vertical distribution of water uptake by trees under different water supply regimes, the subject of this study, conducted in a Scots pine stand on sandy loam in northern Sweden. The objective was to determine the water uptake distribution in pines under two different water regimes, desiccation (no precipitation) and irrigation (2 mm day-1 in July and 1 mm day-1 in August), and to relate the uptake to water content, root and soil texture distributions. The natural 18O gradient in soil water was exploited, in combination with two added tracers, 2H at 10 cm and 3H at 20 cm depth. Extraction of xylem sap and water from the soil profile then enabled evaluation of relative water uptake from four different soil depths (humus layer, 0-10, 10-25 and 25-55 cm) in each of two 50-m2 plots per treatment. In addition, water content, root biomass and soil texture were determined. There were differences in vertical water uptake distribution between treatments. In July, the pines at the irrigated and desiccated plots took up 50% and 30%, respectively, of their water from the upper layers, down to 25 cm depth. In August, the pines on the irrigated plots took up a greater proportion of their water from layers below 25 cm deep than they did in July. In a linear regression, the mean hydraulic conductivity for each mineral soil horizon explained a large part of the variation in relative water uptake. No systematic variation in the residual water uptake correlated to the root distribution. It was therefore concluded that the distribution of water uptake by the pines at Åheden was not a function of root density in the mineral soil, but was largely determined by the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hydrogen isotopes; Key words Xylem sap; Oxygen isotope; Root distribution; Soil hydraulic conductivity

Year:  1999        PMID: 28307769     DOI: 10.1007/s004420050807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Plant responses to precipitation in desert ecosystems: integrating functional types, pulses, thresholds, and delays.

Authors:  Kiona Ogle; James F Reynolds
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Drought reduces water uptake in beech from the drying topsoil, but no compensatory uptake occurs from deeper soil layers.

Authors:  Arthur Gessler; Lukas Bächli; Elham Rouholahnejad Freund; Kerstin Treydte; Marcus Schaub; Matthias Haeni; Markus Weiler; Stefan Seeger; John Marshall; Christian Hug; Roman Zweifel; Frank Hagedorn; Andreas Rigling; Matthias Saurer; Katrin Meusburger
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 10.323

3.  Floodplain ecohydrology: Climatic, anthropogenic, and local physical controls on partitioning of water sources to riparian trees.

Authors:  Michael Bliss Singer; Christopher I Sargeant; Hervé Piégay; Jérémie Riquier; Rob J S Wilson; Cristina M Evans
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 5.240

4.  Stable isotope measurements show increases in corn water use efficiency under deficit irrigation.

Authors:  Youjie Wu; Taisheng Du; Yusen Yuan; Manoj K Shukla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Root Architecture and Functional Traits of Spring Wheat Under Contrasting Water Regimes.

Authors:  Nidia Brunel-Saldias; Juan Pedro Ferrio; Abdelhalim Elazab; Massiel Orellana; Alejandro Del Pozo
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Origin and hydrodynamics of xylem sap in tree stems, and relationship to root uptake of soil water.

Authors:  Yasunori Mahara; Tomoko Ohta; Jyunichi Ohshima; Kazuya Iizuka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Prevalence and magnitude of groundwater use by vegetation: a global stable isotope meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jaivime Evaristo; Jeffrey J McDonnell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.