Literature DB >> 28307764

Partitioning of 14C-labeled photosynthate to allelochemicals and primary metabolites in source and sink leaves of aspen: evidence for secondary metabolite turnover.

Karl W Kleiner1, Kenneth F Raffa1, Richard E Dickson2.   

Abstract

Theories on allelochemical concentrations in plants are often based upon the relative carbon costs and benefits of multiple metabolic fractions. Tests of these theories often rely on measuring metabolite concentrations, but frequently overlook priorities in carbon partitioning. We conducted a pulse-labeling experiment to follow the partitioning of 14CO2-labeled photosynthate into ten metabolic pools representing growth and maintenance (amino acids, organic acids, lipids plus pigments, protein, residue), defense (phenolic glycosides, methanol:water and acetone-soluble tannins/phenolics), and transport and storage (sugars and starch) in source and importing sink leaves of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides). The peak period of 14C incorporation into sink leaves occurred at 24 h. Within 48 h of labeling, the specific radioactivity (dpm/mg dry leaf weight) of phenolic glycosides declined by over one-third in source and sink leaves. In addition, the specific radioactivity in the tannin/phenolic fraction decreased by 53% and 28% in source and sink leaves, respectively. On a percent recovery basis, sink leaves partitioned 1.7 times as much labeled photosynthate into phenolic glycosides as source leaves at peak 14C incorporation. In contrast, source leaves partitioned 1.8 times as much 14C-labeled photosynthate into tannins/phenolics as importing sink leaves. At the end of the 7-day chase period, sink leaves retained 18%, 52%, and 30% of imported 14C photosynthate, and labeled source leaves retained 15%, 66%, and 19% of in situ photosynthate in metabolic fractions representing transport and storage, growth and maintenance, and defense, respectively. Analyses of the phenolic fractions showed that total phenolics were twice as great and condensed tannins were 1.7 times greater in sink than in source leaves. The concentration of total phenolics and condensed tannins did not change in source and sink leaves during the 7-day chase period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aspen; Key words Phenolic glycosides; Metabolic turnover; Phenolics; Plant chemical defense

Year:  1999        PMID: 28307764     DOI: 10.1007/s004420050802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Difference in defense strategy in flower heads and leaves of Asteraceae: multiple-species approach.

Authors:  Michio Oguro; Satoki Sakai
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Long-term experimental warming, shading and nutrient addition affect the concentration of phenolic compounds in arctic-alpine deciduous and evergreen dwarf shrubs.

Authors:  Anja H Hansen; Sven Jonasson; Anders Michelsen; Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Differential expression of two distinct phenylalanine ammonia-lyase genes in condensed tannin-accumulating and lignifying cells of quaking aspen.

Authors:  Yu-Ying Kao; Scott A Harding; Chung-Jui Tsai
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Leaf ontogeny influences leaf phenolics and the efficacy of genetically expressed Bacillus thuringiensis cry1A(a) d-endotoxin in hybrid poplar against gypsy moth.

Authors:  Karl W Kleiner; David D Ellis; Brent H McCown; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Genetic variation in aspen phytochemical patterns structures windows of opportunity for gypsy moth larvae.

Authors:  Michael A Falk; Richard L Lindroth; Ken Keefover-Ring; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Specificity of phenolic glycoside induction in willow seedlings (Salix sericea) in response to herbivory.

Authors:  Mark J Fields; Colin M Orians
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.793

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.