Literature DB >> 28307683

A method for analysing spatial scales of variation in composition of assemblages.

A J Underwood1, M G Chapman1.   

Abstract

In several areas of research on ecological assemblages, it is useful to be able to analyse patterns of spatial variation at various scales. Multivariate analyses of dissimilarity or similarity in assemblages of species are limited by problems of non-independence caused by repeated use of the sample-units. Where rank-order procedures are used, no comparative quantitative measurements of dissimilarity at different scales are produced. An alternative method is described that uses the sample's average assemblage (or centroid). These estimates are themselves averaged to give centroids for larger spatial scales. Dissimilarities from the centroids at each scale are then calculated using independent replicates for each scale from those in each sample. The dissimilarity measures can then be examined by analysis of variance to detect spatial scales of differences for each sample at every level of a hierarchy of scales. The method is illustrated using data from mangrove forests and rocky shores, involving up to 97 taxonomic groups (species, other taxa). Differences among assemblages at the scales of sites (tens of meters apart) or locations at shores (hundreds of meters apart) were identified. Consequences of different numbers of replicates are discussed, with some potential problems (and their solutions) in application.

Keywords:  Hierarchy; Key words Assemblages; Multivariate analyses; Spatial scale

Year:  1998        PMID: 28307683     DOI: 10.1007/s004420050694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Staggered nested designs to assess scales of variability: the advantages of a spatially explicit analysis.

Authors:  Russell G Cole
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Effects of non-indigenous oysters on microbial diversity and ecosystem functioning.

Authors:  Dannielle S Green; Bas Boots; Tasman P Crowe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Variation in community structure across vertical intertidal stress gradients: how does it compare with horizontal variation at different scales?

Authors:  Nelson Valdivia; Ricardo A Scrosati; Markus Molis; Amanda S Knox
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Herbivore-Alga Interaction Strength Influences Spatial Heterogeneity in a Kelp-Dominated Intertidal Community.

Authors:  Moisés A Aguilera; Nelson Valdivia; Bernardo R Broitman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cross-Scale Variation in Biodiversity-Environment Links Illustrated by Coastal Sandflat Communities.

Authors:  Casper Kraan; Carsten F Dormann; Barry L Greenfield; Simon F Thrush
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.