Literature DB >> 28307427

Non-consumptive effects of larval Salamandra on crustacean prey: can eggs detect predators?

Leon Blaustein1.   

Abstract

Predators affect prey populations not only by prey consumption but also in nonconsumptive ways including modifying prey behavior. I tested the effects of fire salamander larvae (Salamandra infraimmaculata) on populations of co-occurring crustacean species in artificial outdoor pools. I also tested whether these effects were due entirely to prey consumption by Salamandra larvae or alternatively to some nonconsumptive effect. The soil (containing crustacean eggs) added to the artificial pools was collected from a dried-out temporary pool that is inhabited by Salamandra during the early part of the hydroperiod. I randomly assigned the pools to one of three treatments: control, free Salamandra, or caged Salamandra. Free salamander larvae could roam the entire pool and prey upon crustaceans. Caged salamander larvae were placed within a cage with having 250-μm mesh windows. They could not prey upon the crustaceans but could, for example, influence them by chemical cues. Densities of the three dominant crustacean species (Arctodiaptomus similis, Ceriodaphnia quadrangula and Cyzicus sp.) were drastically reduced in both salamander treatments compared to the control. Crustacean densities, however, were not significantly different between the two salamander treatments. One plausible explanation is that crustacean eggs can detect the presence of this predator via chemical cues and delay hatching.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Key words Crustacea ;   Predation ;  Induced response ;  Salamandra ;  Temporary pools

Year:  1997        PMID: 28307427     DOI: 10.1007/s004420050152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  Brook charr alevins alter timing of nest emergence in response to chemical cues from fish predators.

Authors:  R S Mirza; D P Chivers; J G Godin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Should I stay or should I go: predator- and conspecific-induced hatching in a marine snail.

Authors:  Benjamin G Miner; Deborah A Donovan; Kelley E Andrews
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Consequences of induced hatching plasticity depend on predator community.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wojdak; Justin C Touchon; Jessica L Hite; Beth Meyer; James R Vonesh
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Diagnosing predation risk effects on demography: can measuring physiology provide the means?

Authors:  Liana Y Zanette; Michael Clinchy; Justin P Suraci
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Density and intercohort priority effects on larval Salamandra salamandra in temporary pools.

Authors:  Avi Eitam; Leon Blaustein; Marc Mangel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Influence of diet-related chemical cues from predators on the hatching of egg-carrying spiders.

Authors:  Daiqin Li; Robert R Jackson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  To hatch and hatch not: similar selective trade-offs but different responses to egg predators in two closely related, syntopic treefrogs.

Authors:  Ivan Gomez-Mestre; Karen M Warkentin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 3.298

8.  Developmental asynchrony might not reduce fitness in early life in painted turtles.

Authors:  P L Colbert; R-J Spencer; F J Janzen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  The many faces of fear: comparing the pathways and impacts of nonconsumptive predator effects on prey populations.

Authors:  Evan L Preisser; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.