Literature DB >> 28307324

Nitrogen uptake from prey and substrate as affected by prey capture level and plant reproductive status in four carnivorous plant species.

H M Hanslin1, P S Karlsson2,3.   

Abstract

Uptake of nitrogen from prey and substrate and partitioning of prey-derived nitrogen were studied in the carnivorous plant species Pinguicula alpina, P. villosa, P. vulgaris and Drosera rotundifolia in a subarctic environment. Efficiency in nitrogen uptake from prey was evaluated by tracing 15N from 15N-enriched Drosophila flies fed to the plants. The in situ uptake efficiency differed somewhat between species and ranged from 29 to 41% of prey N. This efficiency was not affected by different feeding levels or plant reproductive status (flowering or non-flowering). A test of the amount of N absorbed from prey caught on flower stalks of Pinguicula villosa and P. vulgaris showed that both species took up little of what was available in prey (2.5% or less). The uptake efficiency found in greenhouse grown plants was higher than in plants in situ (40-50% vs. 30-40% respectively). This could probably best be explained by the absence of rain and a higher temperature in the greenhouse. The prey-derived 15N was traced to reproductive organs and winter buds. Non-flowering individuals allocated 58-97% of the N derived from prey to their winter buds. Flowering individuals allocated 17-43% of the N income from prey to reproduction, while 34-71% were allocated to buds. Root uptake of nitrogen was stimulated by increased prey capture. This increase in uptake of nitrogen from the substrate was larger than the potential direct uptake of nitrogen from captured prey.

Entities:  

Keywords:  15N; Carnivorous plants; Drosera; Nitrogen uptake; Pinguicula

Year:  1996        PMID: 28307324     DOI: 10.1007/BF00334564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  The feeding ecology of a carnivorous plant (Pinguicula nevadense): prey analysis and capture constraints.

Authors:  Regino Zamora
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Segregation of habitat and prey in two sympatric carnivorous plant species, Drosera rotundifolia and Drosera intermedia.

Authors:  M Thum
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The significance of carnivory for the fitness of Drosera in its natural habitat : 1. The reactions of Drosera intermedia and D. rotundifolia to supplementary feeding.

Authors:  Martin Thum
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Contrasting effects of supplementary feeding of insects or mineral nutrients on the growth and nitrogen and phosphorous economy of pygmy species of Drosera.

Authors:  P S Karlsson; J S Pate
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The significance of carnivory for the fitness of Drosera in its natural habitat : 2. The amount of captured prey and its effect on Drosera intermedia and Drosera rotundifolia.

Authors:  Martin Thum
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Prey capture by three Pinguicula species in a subarctic environment.

Authors:  P S Karlsson; L M Thorén; H M Hanslin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The utilization of nitrogen from insect capture by different growth forms of Drosera from Southwest Australia.

Authors:  E -D Schulze; G Gebauer; W Schulze; J S Pate
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Trapping efficiency of three carnivorous Pinguicula species.

Authors:  P S Karlsson; K O Nordell; S Eirefelt; A Svensson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  A cytochemical study of the leaf-gland enzymes of insectivorous plants of the genus Pinguicula.

Authors:  Y Heslop-Harrison; R B Knox
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 4.116

  9 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Quite a few reasons for calling carnivores 'the most wonderful plants in the world'.

Authors:  Elzbieta Król; Bartosz J Płachno; Lubomír Adamec; Maria Stolarz; Halina Dziubińska; Kazimierz Trebacz
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Evidence for competition between carnivorous plants and spiders.

Authors:  David E Jennings; James J Krupa; Thomas R Raffel; Jason R Rohr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Plant carnivory beyond bogs: reliance on prey feeding in Drosophyllum lusitanicum (Drosophyllaceae) in dry Mediterranean heathland habitats.

Authors:  M Paniw; E Gil-Cabeza; F Ojeda
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Strategy of nitrogen acquisition and utilization by carnivorous Dionaea muscipula.

Authors:  Jörg Kruse; Peng Gao; Anne Honsel; Jürgen Kreuzwieser; Tim Burzlaff; Saleh Alfarraj; Rainer Hedrich; Heinz Rennenberg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Carnivory in the teasel Dipsacus fullonum--the effect of experimental feeding on growth and seed set.

Authors:  Peter J A Shaw; Kyle Shackleton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evidence for facultative protocarnivory in Capsella bursa-pastoris seeds.

Authors:  Hattie R Roberts; John M Warren; Jim Provan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Environmental differences between sites control the diet and nutrition of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia.

Authors:  Joni L Cook; J Newton; J Millett
Journal:  Plant Soil       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 4.192

8.  A new carnivorous plant lineage (Triantha) with a unique sticky-inflorescence trap.

Authors:  Qianshi Lin; Cécile Ané; Thomas J Givnish; Sean W Graham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Jasmonate-independent regulation of digestive enzyme activity in the carnivorous butterwort Pinguicula × Tina.

Authors:  Ondřej Kocáb; Jana Jakšová; Ondřej Novák; Ivan Petřík; René Lenobel; Ivo Chamrád; Andrej Pavlovič
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 6.992

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.