Literature DB >> 28307208

Adult population density, fecundity and productivity in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.

J S F Barker1.   

Abstract

Single-species cultures of D. melanogaster Oregon-R-C and D. simulans v were set up with 5, 50, 100, 200, 300 or 400 pairs of parents. These parents were discarded after 48 hours, and the numbers and wet weights of emerging progeny recorded twice daily. For each culture, the fitness components estimated were total number of progeny, total progeny biomass, average male and average female wet weights, mean developmental period, and sex ratio. D. melanogaster had higher progeny productivity and longer mean developmental period. For both species, as adult density increased, progeny number per culture increased to a maximum and then decreased, but the average number of progeny per female decreased rapidly from the lowest density. The cause of this decreased progeny number per female differed in the two species. For simulans, it was due to decreased fecundity per female, possibly a behavioural response to crowding. For melanogaster, the decreased progeny number per female was mainly due to reduced immature stage viability as a result of increased larval crowding. Reduction in fecundity per female was relatively small, as compared with simulans.

Entities:  

Year:  1973        PMID: 28307208     DOI: 10.1007/BF00345125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  THE CAPACITY FOR INCREASE IN CHROMOSOMALLY POLYMORPHIC AND MONOMORPHIC POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA.

Authors:  T DOBZHANSKY; R C LEWONTIN; O PAVLOVSKY
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1964-11       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  The estimation of relative fitness of Drosophila populations.

Authors:  P J CLARINGBOLD; J S BARKER
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  On the Influence of Density of Population Upon the Rate of Reproduction in Drosophila.

Authors:  R Pearl; S L Parker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1922-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  THE ESTIMATION OF RELATIVE FITNESS OF DROSOPHILA POPULATIONS. V. GENERATION INTERVAL AND HETEROGENEITY IN COMPETITION.

Authors:  J S F Barker
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1967-06       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  THE FITNESS OF SINGLE-SPECIES POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA.

Authors:  J S F Barker
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Chromosomal polymorphism and capacity for increase under near optimal conditions.

Authors:  S Ohba
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 3.821

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Genetic analysis of Drosophila melanogaster egg insertion behavior.

Authors:  J Albornoz; A Domínguez
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  Interspecific competition betweenDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans : Reduction in fecundity and destruction of eggs when the medium is inhabited by larvae.

Authors:  J J Moth; J S F Barker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Density, frequency and interspecific competition: Fertility ofDrosophila simulans andDrosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J J Moth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Ovarian activity and reproductive potential in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Josselyne Boulétreau
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Drosophila larval foraging behavior. I. The sibling species, D. melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  M B Sokolowski; R I Hansell
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  Life-history traits and physiological limits of the alpine fly Drosophila nigrosparsa (Diptera: Drosophilidae): A comparative study.

Authors:  Martin-Carl Kinzner; Patrick Krapf; Martina Nindl; Carina Heussler; Stephanie Eisenkölbl; Ary A Hoffmann; Julia Seeber; Wolfgang Arthofer; Birgit C Schlick-Steiner; Florian M Steiner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Adaptation to developmental diet influences the response to selection on age at reproduction in the fruit fly.

Authors:  Christina M May; Joost van den Heuvel; Agnieszka Doroszuk; Katja M Hoedjes; Thomas Flatt; Bas J Zwaan
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.