Literature DB >> 28307163

Protozoa, Nematoda and Lumbricidae in the rhizosphere of Hordelymus europeaus (Poaceae): faunal interactions, response of microorganisms and effects on plant growth.

Jörn Alphei1, Michael Bonkowski1, Stefan Scheu1.   

Abstract

Interactions among protozoa (mixed cultures of ciliates, flagellates and naked amoebae), bacteria-feeding nematodes (Pellioditis pellio Schneider) and the endogeic earthworm species Aporrectodea caliginosa (Savigny) were investigated in experimental chambers with soil from a beechwood (Fagus sylvatica L.) on limestone. Experimental chambers were planted with the grass Hordelymus europeaus L. (Poaceae) and three compartments separated by 45-μm mesh were established: rhizosphere, intermediate and non-rhizosphere. The experiment lasted for 16 weeks and the following parameters were measured at the end of the experiment: shoot and root mass of H. europaeus, carbon and nitrogen content in shoots and roots, density of ciliates, amoebae, flagellates and nematodes, microbial biomass (SIR), basal respiration, streptomycin sensitive respiration, ammonium and nitrate contents, phosphate content of soil compartments. In addition, leaching of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and leachate pH were measured at regular intervals in leachate obtained from suction cups in the experimental chambers. Protozoa stimulated the recovery of nitrifying bacteria following defaunation (by chloroform fumigation) and increased nitrogen losses as nitrate in leachate. In contrast, protozoa and nematodes reduced leaching of phosphate, an effect ascribed to stimulation of microbial growth early in the experiment. Earthworms strongly increased the amount of extractable mineral nitrogen whereas it was strongly reduced by protozoa and nematodes. Both protozoa and nematodes reduced the stimulatory effect of earthworms on nitrogen mineralization. Microbial biomass, basal respiration, and numbers of protozoa and nematodes increased in the vicinity of the root. Protozoa generally caused a decrease in microbial biomass whereas nematodes and earthworms reduced microbial biomass only in the absence of protozoa. None of the animals studied significantly affected basal respiration, but specific respiration of microorganisms (O2 consumption per unit biomass) was generally higher in animal treatments. The stimulatory effect of nematodes and earthworms, however, occurred only in the absence of protozoa. The sensitivity of respiration to streptomycin suggested that protozoa selectively grazed on bacterial biomass but the bacterial/fungal ratio appeared to be unaffected by grazing of P. pellio. Earthworms reduced root biomass of H. europaeus, although shoot biomass remained unaffected, and concentrations of nitrogen in shoots and particularly in roots were strongly increased by earthworms. Both nematodes and protozoa increased plant biomass, particularly that of roots. This increase in plant biomass was accompanied by a marked decrease in nitrogen concentrations in roots and to a lesser extent in shoots. Generally, the effects of protozoa on plant growth considerably exceeded those of nematodes. It is concluded that nematodes and protozoa stimulated plant growth by non-nutritional effects, whereas the effects of earthworms were caused by an increase in nutrient supply to H. europaeus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aporrectodea caliginosa; Microbial biomass; Pellioditis pellio; Plant nutrient supply; Rhizosphere

Year:  1996        PMID: 28307163     DOI: 10.1007/BF00334413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  A method of estimating the numbers of soil protozoa, especially amoebae, based on their differential feeding on bacteria.

Authors:  B N SINGH
Journal:  Ann Appl Biol       Date:  1946-02       Impact factor: 2.750

2.  Measurement of bacterial and fungal contributions to respiration of selected agricultural and forest soils.

Authors:  J P Anderson; K H Domsch
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Trophic interactions in soils as they affect energy and nutrient dynamics. III. Biotic interactions of bacteria, amoebae, and nematodes.

Authors:  R V Anderson; E T Elliott; J F McClellan; D C Coleman; C V Cole; H W Hunt
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Protozoan grazing of bacteria in soil-impact and importance.

Authors:  M Clarholm
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Changes in microbial nutrient status during secondary succession and its modification by earthworms.

Authors:  S Scheu
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The influence of earthworms (Lumbricidae) on the nitrogen dynamics in the soil litter system of a deciduous forest.

Authors:  S Scheu
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Resource allocation of beech seedlings (Fagus sylvatica L.) -relationship to earthworm activity and soil conditions.

Authors:  Volkmar Wolters; Walter Stickan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.225

  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  Can the soil fauna of boreal forests recover from lead-derived stress in a shooting range area?

Authors:  Salla Selonen; Mira Liiri; Heikki Setälä
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Effects of earthworms and organic litter distribution on plant performance and aphid reproduction.

Authors:  Susanne Wurst; Reinhard Langel; August Reineking; Michael Bonkowski; Stefan Scheu
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Earthworms and litter distribution affect plant-defensive chemistry.

Authors:  Susanne Wurst; Dereje Dugassa-Gobena; Stefan Scheu
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Exotic earthworm effects on hardwood forest floor, nutrient availability and native plants: a mesocosm study.

Authors:  Cindy M Hale; Lee E Frelich; Peter B Reich; John Pastor
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Utilization of organic nitrogen by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-is there a specific role for protists and ammonia oxidizers?

Authors:  Petra Bukovská; Michael Bonkowski; Tereza Konvalinková; Olena Beskid; Martina Hujslová; David Püschel; Veronika Řezáčová; María Semiramis Gutiérrez-Núñez; Milan Gryndler; Jan Jansa
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 3.387

6.  Carbon availability controls the growth of detritivores (Lumbricidae) and their effect on nitrogen mineralization.

Authors:  Alexei V Tiunov; Stefan Scheu
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Contrasting effects of soil microbial interactions on growth-defence relationships between early- and mid-successional plant communities.

Authors:  Stefan Geisen; Robin Heinen; Elena Andreou; Teun van Lent; Freddy C Ten Hooven; Madhav P Thakur
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 10.323

8.  Effects of interactions of auxin-producing bacteria and bacterial-feeding nematodes on regulation of peanut growths.

Authors:  Li Xu; Wensi Xu; Ying Jiang; Feng Hu; Huixin Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Maize (Zea mays L.) Root Growth and Its Potential Consequences for the Assembly of the Rhizosphere Microbiota.

Authors:  Michael Bonkowski; Mika Tarkka; Bahar S Razavi; Hannes Schmidt; Evgenia Blagodatskaya; Robert Koller; Peng Yu; Claudia Knief; Frank Hochholdinger; Doris Vetterlein
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.