Literature DB >> 28307089

Mobility of Impatiens capensis flowers: effect on pollen deposition and hummingbird foraging.

Allen H Hurlbert1, S Aki Hosoi1, Ethan J Temeles1, Paul W Ewald1.   

Abstract

Flexible pedicels are characteristic of birdpollinated plants, yet have received little attention in studies of hummingbird-flower interactions. A major implication of flexible pedicels is that flowers may move during pollination. We examined whether such motion affected interactions between ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) and jewelweed (Impatiens capensis) by increasing pollen deposition and by altering the effectiveness of nectar removal. For I. capensis, flower mobility enhanced pollen deposition: birds had significantly longer contact with anthers and more pollen deposited on their bills and crowns when foraging at mobile flowers than at flowers that had been experimentally immobilized. In contrast, flower mobility imposed a cost on hummingbirds by significantly increasing their handling times and reducing their extraction rates relative to their interactions with immobile flowers. Field observations indicated that the motion observed during hummingbird visits did not occur when bees (Bombus spp., Apis mellifera) visited I. capensis flowers, which suggests that the mobility of I. capensis flowers is an adaptation for hummingbird pollination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Archilochus colubris; Flower morphology; Hummingbird; Impatiens capensis; Pollination

Year:  1996        PMID: 28307089     DOI: 10.1007/BF00328553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  1 in total

1.  Competition between hummingbirds and bumble bees for nectar in flowers of Impatiens biflora.

Authors:  Terence M Laverty; R C Plowright
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.225

  1 in total
  4 in total

1.  Plant-hummingbird interactions in the West Indies: floral specialisation gradients associated with environment and hummingbird size.

Authors:  Bo Dalsgaard; Ana M Martín González; Jens M Olesen; Jeff Ollerton; Allan Timmermann; Laila H Andersen; Adrianne G Tossas
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  A lever action hypothesis for pendulous hummingbird flowers: experimental evidence from a columbine.

Authors:  E F LoPresti; J Goidell; J M Mola; M L Page; C D Specht; C Stuligross; M G Weber; N M Williams; R Karban
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Effect of floral orifice width and shape on hummingbird-flower interactions.

Authors:  C E Smith; J T Stevens; E J Temeles; P W Ewald; R J Hebert; R L Bonkovsky
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Circadian rhythm of a Silene species favours nocturnal pollination and constrains diurnal visitation.

Authors:  Samuel Prieto-Benítez; Stefan Dötterl; Luis Giménez-Benavides
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.357

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.