Literature DB >> 28307043

Measures of gene flow in the Columbian ground squirrel.

F Stephen Dobson1,2.   

Abstract

From analyses of published data and a review of the literature, I studied indirect and direct measures of gene flow among populations of Columbian ground squirrels, Spermophilus columbianus. New analyses were used to examine an allozyme data set (seven polymorphic loci) that had been collected by Zammuto and Millar (1985a) from six populations of ground squirrels that were spread over 183 km. G-tests indicated significant variation in allele frequencies among populations, but F-statistics revealed relatively little population differentiation (average F ST=0.026). F ST values were used to estimate rates of gene flow indirectly and indicated fairly high rates of gene flow (average N e m=13.5). Recorded dispersal distances of individual ground squirrels were fairly short (most<4 km, maximum recorded distance was 8.5 km), and the minimum distance between populations used to create the allozyme data set was about 25 km. Thus, direct dispersal among the populations in the allozyme data set was highly unlikely. Small genetically effective populations may have experienced high rates of migration over short distances (about 43% of adults in local populations were immigrants), however, resulting in homogeneous allele frequencies over the geographic range. This explanation provides an alternative to invoking gene flow in the recent past to explain discrepancies between dispersal distances in the field and homogenization of allele frequencies over large ranges, Mammalian species that have virtually complete dispersal of subadult males from the natal area might be expected to exhibit relatively high rates of gene flow, regardless of actual dispersal distances. Genetically effective populations may be much smaller than more extensive ecological populations and experience higher rates of gene flow.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allozymes; Dispersal; F-statistics; Immigration; Spermophilus

Year:  1994        PMID: 28307043     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  19 in total

1.  Gene diversity and female philopatry.

Authors:  R K Chesser
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Influence of gene flow and breeding tactics on gene diversity within populations.

Authors:  R K Chesser
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  GROUP SELECTION: THE INTERACTION OF LOCAL DEME SIZE AND MIGRATION IN THE DIFFERENTIATION OF SMALL POPULATIONS.

Authors:  Michael J Wade; David E McCauley
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  GENE FLOW IN CAVE ARTHROPODS: A QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACH.

Authors:  Adalgisa Caccone
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  FIXATION PROBABILITIES AND FIXATION TIMES IN A SUBDIVIDED POPULATION.

Authors:  Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY.

Authors:  Sara Via; Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations.

Authors:  M Slatkin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Geographic variation, speciation, and clines.

Authors:  J A Endler
Journal:  Monogr Popul Biol       Date:  1977

9.  Population genetics of euphydryas butterflies. I Genetic variation and the neutrality hypothesis.

Authors:  S W McKechnie; P R Ehrlich; R R White
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  DISPERSAL AND GENETIC STRUCTURE IN KANGAROO RATS.

Authors:  Peter M Waser; Lee F Elliott
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.