Literature DB >> 28307040

Spatial population structure in the banner-tailed kangaroo rat, Dipodomys spectabilis.

Priyanga Amarasekare1.   

Abstract

I attempted to characterize spatial units of local dynamics and dispersal in banner-tailed kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis), to determine if spatial structure influenced population dynamics in the way predicted by current metapopulation models. D. spectabilis exhibited a hierarchical spatial structure. "Local populations" that appeared as discrete entities on a scale of kilometers were subdivided into clusters of mounds on a scale of meters. This structure, however, cannot be characyerized in terms of the discrete habitat patches envisioned by the metapopulation models. Occupied areas were statistically distinguishable from the surrounding matrix, but this difference was only quantitative. There were no discrete boundaries between occupied areas and the matrix. Habitat within occupied areas was heterogeneous, and occupied areas in different locations were statistically distinguishable from each other. High heterogeneity within occupied areas, and high contrast among them, make it difficult to define what is a suitable habitat patch for D. spectabilis. On a smaller spatial scale, there was significant aggregation of resident mounds within occupied areas. These aggregations, however, do not correspond to discrete habitat patches. Rather, they appear to result from an interaction between fine-scale habitat heterogeneity and limited dispersal due to natal philopatry and low adult vagility. These complications make it difficult to identify habitat patches independent of the species' distribution. For species like D. spectabilis that are patchily distributed but do not occupy discrete habitat patches, a patch occupancy approach does not seem appropriate for describing spatial structure. Hierarchical spatial structure underscores the need for a framework that incorporates multiple scales of spatial structure, rather than one that pre-imposes a single spatial scale as being important for population dynamics. A framework that (i) considers patchiness as a combination of both habitat heterogeneity, and life-history and behavioral characteristics, and (ii) incorporates hierarchical spatial structure, appears to be the most suitable for conceptualizing spatial dynamics of behaviorally complex vertebrates such as D. spectabilis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dipodomys spectabilis; Metapopulation; Population dynamics; Spatial population structure; Spatial subdivision

Year:  1994        PMID: 28307040     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Aggregation and stability in metapopulation models.

Authors:  W W Murdoch; C J Briggs; R M Nisbet; W S Gurney; A Stewart-Oaten
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  I Hanski
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  A Metapopulation Model of the Peregrine Falcon in California: Viability and Management Strategies.

Authors:  J Timothy Wootton; Douglas A Bell
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  A simple simulation model of dispersal of animals among units of discrete habitats.

Authors:  Roger Kitching
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  DISPERSAL AND GENETIC STRUCTURE IN KANGAROO RATS.

Authors:  Peter M Waser; Lee F Elliott
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.694

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  The many faces of population density.

Authors:  Stephen J Mayor; James A Schaefer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Extinction and colonization processes in subpopulations of five neotropical small mammal species.

Authors:  Mauricio Lima; Pablo A Marquet; Fabian M Jaksic
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Landscape pattern determines neighborhood size and structure within a lizard population.

Authors:  Wade A Ryberg; Michael T Hill; Charles W Painter; Lee A Fitzgerald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.