Literature DB >> 28307014

Environmental heterogeneity and clonal growth: a study of the capacity for reciprocal translocation in Glechoma hederacea L.

Josef F Stuefer1, M J Hutchings2.   

Abstract

Clonal fragments of Glechoma hederacea L. (Lamiaceae) were subjected to environments in which light and nutrients were supplied with a strictly negative association in space, i.e. when one of these resources was in ample supply the other was scarce. Treatments were chosen to simulate environments in which clones grew either within homogeneous conditions or across patch types (heterogeneous conditions). The hypothesis was tested that reciprocal translocation (i.e. exchange of both nutrients and assimilates) between connected groups of ramets would increase biomass production of clones growing under heterogeneous conditions compared to that of clones growing in homogeneous conditions. A cost-benefit analysis was carried out to test this hypothesis. Results suggested that reciprocal translocation did not occur at the structural scale considered in this experiment; no evidence was found for a significant effect on whole clone biomass of assimilate and/or nutrient translocation between clone parts experiencing contrasting levels of resource supply. It is suggested that predominantly acropetal movement of resources and the pattern of integrated physiological unit formation in G. hederacea are the main properties responsible for the lack of mutual physiological support between connected clonal fragments growing in differing habitat conditions. These properties are expected to promote clonal expansion and the exploitation of new territory, rather than sustaining clone parts in sub-optimal patches of habitat for prolonged periods of time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clonal growth; Cost-benefit analysis; Environmental heterogeneity; Glechoma hederacea; Integrated physiological units

Year:  1994        PMID: 28307014     DOI: 10.1007/BF00316958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Biological feedbacks in global desertification.

Authors:  W H Schlesinger; J F Reynolds; G L Cunningham; L F Huenneke; W M Jarrell; R A Virginia; W G Whitford
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Integrated physiological units in plants.

Authors:  M A Watson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Reciprocal transport between ramets increases growth of Fragaria chiloensis when light and nitrogen occur in separate patches but only if patches are rich.

Authors:  Deb Friedman; Peter Alpert
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The effect of local resource availability and clonal integration on ramet functional morphology in Hydrocotyle bonariensis.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  An analysis of the costs and benefits of physiological integration between ramets in the clonal perennial herb Glechoma hederacea.

Authors:  A J Slade; M J Hutchings
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Resource sharing among ramets in the clonal herb, Fragaria chiloensis.

Authors:  P Alpert; H A Mooney
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The effect of resource integration on fitness related traits in a clonal dune perennial, Hydrocotyle bonariensis.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Neighbors ameliorate local salinity stress for a rhizomatous plant in a heterogeneous environment.

Authors:  Amy G Salzman; Matthew A Parker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.225

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Remediation of blowouts by clonal plants in Maqu degraded alpine grasslands of northwest China.

Authors:  JianJun Kang; WenZhi Zhao; Ming Zhao
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Do clonal plants show greater division of labour morphologically and physiologically at higher patch contrasts?

Authors:  Zhengwen Wang; Yuanheng Li; Heinjo J During; Linghao Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Epigenetic Memory as a Basis for Intelligent Behavior in Clonal Plants.

Authors:  Vít Latzel; Alejandra P Rendina González; Jonathan Rosenthal
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  The Intensity of Simulated Grazing Modifies Costs and Benefits of Physiological Integration in a Rhizomatous Clonal Plant.

Authors:  Jushan Liu; Chen Chen; Yao Pan; Yang Zhang; Ying Gao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Ultraviolet B Radiation Triggers DNA Methylation Change and Affects Foraging Behavior of the Clonal Plant Glechoma longituba.

Authors:  Jiaxin Quan; Vít Latzel; Dan Tie; Yuhan Zhang; Zuzana Münzbergová; Yongfu Chai; Xiao Liu; Ming Yue
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Effects of heterogeneous competitor distribution and ramet aggregation on the growth and size structure of a clonal plant.

Authors:  Bi-Cheng Dong; Jiu-Zhong Wang; Rui-Hua Liu; Ming-Xiang Zhang; Fei-Hai Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Geographic and habitat origin influence biomass production and storage translocation in the clonal plant Aegopodium podagraria.

Authors:  Tina D'Hertefeldt; Johanna M Eneström; Lars B Pettersson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Division of Labor Brings Greater Benefits to Clones of Carpobrotus edulis in the Non-native Range: Evidence for Rapid Adaptive Evolution.

Authors:  Sergio R Roiloa; Rubén Retuerto; Josefina G Campoy; Ana Novoa; Rodolfo Barreiro
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 9.  Ecological Consequences of Clonal Integration in Plants.

Authors:  Fenghong Liu; Jian Liu; Ming Dong
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 5.753

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.