Literature DB >> 28306978

An exception to Darwin's syndrome: floral position, protogyny, and insect visitation in Besseya bullii (Scrophulariaceae).

Mark J McKone1, Rebecca Ostertag1, Jason T Rauscher1, David A Heiser1, F Leland Russell1.   

Abstract

Darwin pointed out that plants with vertical inflorescences are likely to be outcrossed if the inflorescence is acropetalous (flowers from the bottom up), the flowers are protandrous (pollen is dispersed before stigmas are receptive), and pollinators move upward on the inflorescence. This syndrome is common in species pollinated by bees and flies, and very few exceptions are known. We investigated flowering phenology and pollinator behavior in Besseya bullii (Scrophulariaceae) and found that it did not fit Darwin's syndrome. The vertical inflorescence was acropetalous but the flowers were distinctly protogynous, so flowers with newly receptive stigmas appeared on the inflorescence above those with dehiscing anthers. A number of small insects visited B. bullii; bees in the family Halictidae (Augochlorella striata and Dialictus spp.) were most common. When insects moved between gender phases within inflorescences, they moved up more often than down (61% versus 39% of observations, respectively) but this difference was only marginally significant. Most visits were to male-phase flowers only, and this preference was more pronounced for pollen-foraging insects than for nectar-foraging insects. B. bullii was self-compatible, so its flowering characteristics potentially could result in considerable self-pollination. However, an average of 38% of the lowermost flowers opened before any pollen was available on the same inflorescence; these "solo females" had a high probability of outcrossing (though fruit set was relatively low in the bottom portion of the inflorescence). Upper flowers may also be outcrossed because downward insect movement was not uncommon. Therefore protogyny in B. bullii may not necessarily lead to more selfing than would protandry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Besseya bullii; Foraging behavior; Halictidae; Pollination; Protogyny

Year:  1995        PMID: 28306978     DOI: 10.1007/BF00328902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Optimal foraging in bumblebees and coevolution with their plants.

Authors:  Graham H Pyke
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Pollen foraging by bumblebees: Foraging patterns and efficiency on Lupinus polyphyllus.

Authors:  Jared Haynes; Michael Mesler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  INTRASEXUAL SELECTION AND THE SEGREGATION OF POLLEN AND STIGMAS IN HERMAPHRODITE PLANTS, EXEMPLIFIED BY WAHLENBERGIA ALBOMARGINATA (CAMPANULACEAE).

Authors:  David G Lloyd; Jocelyn M A Yates
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Why do nectar-foraging bees and wasps work upwards on inflorescences?

Authors:  Sarah A Corbet; I Cuthill; M Fallows; T Harrison; G Hartley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  POLLINATOR FORAGING ON FOXGLOVE (DIGITALIS PURPUREA): A TEST OF A NEW MODEL.

Authors:  Lynn S Best; Paulette Bierzychudek
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.694

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Sex-specific floral attraction traits in a sequentially hermaphroditic species.

Authors:  Kristen Peach; Jasen W Liu; Kristen N Klitgaard; Susan J Mazer
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.912

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.