Literature DB >> 28306947

Maternal body-volume as a constraint on reproductive output in lizards: evidence from the evolution of viviparity.

Carl P Qualls1, Richard Shine1.   

Abstract

A few species of squamate reptiles contain both oviparous (egg-laying) and viviparous (live-bearing) populations, and thus offer exceptional opportunities to test adaptationist hypotheses on the determinants of reproductive output. We focus on the hypothesis that maternal body-volume constrains reproductive output in squamate reptiles. If females are "full" of eggs, what happens when viviparity evolves within a lineage? Eggs increase in volume and mass during development, primarily due to the uptake of water, so how can they be accommodated within the mother's abdomen? We predict that the resultant increase in relative clutch mass (RCM) will be lessened by (1) a decrease in reproductive output (by reducing the number or size of offspring), and/or (2) an increase in maternal body-volume (via modifications of size or shape of adult females). Our comparisons of conspecific oviparous and viviparous lizards (Lerista bougainvillii) confirm that live-bearers carry heavier clutches (in both absolute and relative terms) and show the predicted shifts in body size and shape of reproductive females. However, offspring size and number were unaffected by the evolution of viviparity, and the shifts in maternal morphology were too small to fully offset the increase in clutch mass. Thus, RCMs increased by 50%, indicating that viviparous females produced clutches which more completely filled the space available in the abdominal cavity. We conclude that maternal body-volume does play a role in determining reproductive output, but that the observed clutch masses may be optimized, rather than maximized, with respect to the abdominal space available.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body-volume; Constraints; Life history; Lizards; Reproductive output

Year:  1995        PMID: 28306947     DOI: 10.1007/BF00328427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

1.  Natural selection and the evolution of reproductive effort.

Authors:  M F Hirshfield; D W Tinkle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Allometric engineering: an experimental test of the causes of interpopulational differences in performance.

Authors:  B Sinervo; R B Huey
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-06-01       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  "Costs" of reproduction in reptiles.

Authors:  Richard Shine
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  RELATIVE CLUTCH MASS AND BODY SHAPE IN LIZARDS AND SNAKES: IS REPRODUCTIVE INVESTMENT CONSTRAINED OR OPTIMIZED?

Authors:  Richard Shine
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.694

  4 in total
  9 in total

1.  Are viviparous lizards more vulnerable to climate warming because they have evolved reduced body temperature and heat tolerance?

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Li Ma; Min Shao; Xiang Ji
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Reproductive allocation strategies: a long-term study on proximate factors and temporal adjustments in a viviparous lizard.

Authors:  Josefa Bleu; Jean-François Le Galliard; Patrick S Fitze; Sandrine Meylan; Jean Clobert; Manuel Massot
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Reassessing breeding investment in birds: class-wide analysis of clutch volume reveals a single outlying family.

Authors:  David M Watson; Susan E Anderson; Valerie Olson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The interplay between natural and sexual selection in the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in Sceloporus lizards (Squamata: Phrynosomatidae).

Authors:  Víctor H Jiménez-Arcos; Salomón Sanabria-Urbán; Raúl Cueva Del Castillo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Macroevolution of sexual size dimorphism and reproduction-related phenotypic traits in lizards of the Chaco Domain.

Authors:  Guadalupe López Juri; Margarita Chiaraviglio; Gabriela Cardozo
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Differential reproductive investment in co-occurring oviparous and viviparous common lizards (Zootoca vivipara) and implications for life-history trade-offs with viviparity.

Authors:  Hans Recknagel; Kathryn R Elmer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Distinct telomere differences within a reproductively bimodal common lizard population.

Authors:  Darryl McLennan; Hans Recknagel; Kathryn R Elmer; Pat Monaghan
Journal:  Funct Ecol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 5.608

8.  Clutch may predict growth of hatchling Burmese pythons better than food availability or sex.

Authors:  Jillian M Josimovich; Bryan G Falk; Alejandro Grajal-Puche; Emma B Hanslowe; Ian A Bartoszek; Robert N Reed; Andrea F Currylow
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 2.422

9.  Understanding the evolution of viviparity using intraspecific variation in reproductive mode and transitional forms of pregnancy.

Authors:  Camilla M Whittington; James U Van Dyke; Stephanie Q T Liang; Scott V Edwards; Richard Shine; Michael B Thompson; Catherine E Grueber
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-01-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.