| Literature DB >> 28306924 |
W E Robe1, H Griffiths1.
Abstract
The decline and disappearance of Littorella uniflora from oligotrophic waters which have become eutrophic has been associated with shading or reduced CO2 supply. However NO inf3sup- concentrations can reach very high levels (100-2000 mmol m-3 compared with <1-3 in oligotrophic habitats). To investigate the impact of NO inf3sup- loading alone, plants were grown under three NO inf3sup- regimes (very low, near-natural and high). The interactive effects of NO inf3sup- and photon flux density (low and high regimes) on N assimilation and accumulation, CO2 concentrating mechanisms, C3 photosynthesis and growth were also examined. The results were unexpected. Increased NO inf3sup- supply had very little effect on photosynthetic capacity, crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) or lacunal CO2 concentrations ([CO2]i), although there was considerable plasticity with respect to light regime. In contrast, increased NO inf3sup- supply resulted in a marked accumulation of NO inf3sup- , free amino acids and soluble protein in shoots and roots (up to 25 mol m-3, 30 mol m-3 and 9 mg g-1 fresh weight respectively in roots), while fresh weight and relative growth rate were reduced. Total N content even under the very low NO inf3sup- regime (1.6-2.3%) was mid-range for aquatic and terrestrial species (and 3.1-4.3% under the high NO inf3sup- regime). These findings, together with field data, suggest that L. uniflora is not growth limited by low NO inf3sup- supply in natural oligotophic habitats, due not to an efficient photosynthetic nitrogen use but to a slow growth rate, a low N requirement and to the use of storage to avoid N stress. However the increased NO inf3sup- concentrations in eutrophic environments seem likely have detrimental effects on the long-term survival of L. uniflora, possibly as a consequence of N accumulation.Entities:
Keywords: Eutrophication; Littorella uniflora; Nitrogen assimilation; Nitrogen use efficiency; Storage
Year: 1994 PMID: 28306924 DOI: 10.1007/BF00317857
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oecologia ISSN: 0029-8549 Impact factor: 3.225