Literature DB >> 28306873

Ecological and life-history correlates of cooperative breeding in South African birds.

M A Du Plessis1, W R Siegfried1, A J Armstrong2.   

Abstract

Our analyses of the incidence of cooperative breeding among South African birds differ from previous studies performed elsewhere in two respects. First, we distinguish between "obligate" (i.e. regular) and "facultative" (i.e. opportunistic) cooperative breeding species (OCS and FCS). Second, we have restricted our analyses to 217 South African bird species considered to be sufficiently well-studied in terms of their basic biology and life-history characteristics. This was done in order to control for the well-known bias against the often poorly-studied avifaunas of extreme environments such as rainforests and deserts. The results of our analysis do not accord fully with those of Australian birds by Ford et al. (1988). Cooperative breeding in South Africa is associated with seasonal environments, whereas in Australia the opposite is the case. Analyses of ecological factors that promote cooperative breeding among South African birds suggest that the evolutionary pathway to obligate and facultative breeding may be fundamentally different. First, OCS live mainly in savanna habitats that have predictable seasonal peaks in food availability, yet where the baseline level of food availability during the nonbreeding season is sufficient to support permanent residence by groups. Small to medium-sized birds of the African savannas are particularly vulnerable to avian predators, and foraging and roosting in permanent groups may enhance their survival. We propose that the benefits of obligate cooperative breeding are derived chiefly from survival of individuals away from the nest (i.e. during the nonbreeding season). Secondly, FCS live largely in unpredictable, seasonal steppe habitats. Under these conditions it may be impossible for birds to maintain permanent group territories, and variation in the tendency to breed cooperatively may depend largely on the opportunistic assessment of environmental conditions. We therefore suggest that birds (i.e. FCS) will opt to breed cooperatively only when conditions are unfavourable for independent breeding, and that the benefits thus accrued are chiefly related to reproduction.

Keywords:  Birds; Cooperative breeding; Group living; Life history; South Africa

Year:  1995        PMID: 28306873     DOI: 10.1007/BF00333250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of delayed dispersal in cooperative breeders.

Authors:  W D Koenig; F A Pitelka; W J Carmen; R L Mumme; M T Stanback
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.875

2.  The phylogenetic component of cooperative breeding in perching birds.

Authors:  S V Edwards; S Naeem
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Evolutionary determinants of clutch size in cavity-nesting birds: nest predation or limited breeding opportunities?

Authors:  T E Martin
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  The phylogenetic component of cooperative breeding in perching birds: a commentary.

Authors:  D A McLennan; D R Brooks
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  On the evolution of clutch size and nest size in passerine birds.

Authors:  T Slagsvold
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Avian cooperative breeding: Old hypotheses and new directions.

Authors:  R G Heinsohn; A Cockburn; R A Mulder
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Obligate cavity-roosting as a constraint on dispersal of green (red-billed) woodhoopoes: consequences for philopatry and the likelihood of inbreeding.

Authors:  Morné A Du Plessis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.225

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Out of Gondwanaland; the evolutionary history of cooperative breeding and social behaviour among crows, magpies, jays and allies.

Authors:  Jan Ekman; Per G P Ericson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Environmental stability and the evolution of cooperative breeding in hornbills.

Authors:  Juan-Carlos T Gonzalez; Ben C Sheldon; Joseph A Tobias
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The evolution of cooperative breeding in birds: kinship, dispersal and life history.

Authors:  Ben J Hatchwell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Consequences of local Allee effects in spatially structured populations.

Authors:  Marcelo H Cassini
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Helping enhances productivity in campo flicker (Colaptes campestris) cooperative groups.

Authors:  Raphael Igor Dias; Michael S Webster; Regina H Macedo
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2015-05-26

6.  What drives cooperative breeding?

Authors:  Walter D Koenig
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Family living sets the stage for cooperative breeding and ecological resilience in birds.

Authors:  Michael Griesser; Szymon M Drobniak; Shinichi Nakagawa; Carlos A Botero
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 8.029

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.