Literature DB >> 28306850

The evolution of offspring size and number: a test of the Smith-Fretwell model in three species of crickets.

Y Carrière1, D A Roff2.   

Abstract

Most models of parental investment in offspring assume a trade-off between propagule size and number, and an increasing "concave down" function relating offspring fitness to propagule size. In this study, we test these two fundamental assumptions, using three closely related species of crickets, Gryllus firmus, G. veletis, and G. pennsylvanicus. Egg weight, 35-day fecundity and 35-day egg biomass were estimated in a population of each species, and the relationships between these reproductive traits and date of egg laying and body size were estimated. The relationships between egg weight and offspring survival were also sought for eggs buried at different depths, soil moistures, and soil types (G. firmus and G. veletis), as well as in the field (G. pennsylvanicus). A trade-off between egg weight and 35-day fecundity was revealed in a multivariate analysis taking into account among-species variation in egg weight and body size. Independent of the environmental conditions affecting the eggs, a positive correlation existed between the number of larvae that emerged from the soil and propagule weight in each species. Therefore, these findings provide partial support for the assumptions considered in the models mentioned above. A single optimal egg size was favored in two out of the three sets of conditions in which the functions relating egg weight to larval survival could be derived. The conditions encountered by the eggs, however, influenced the average survival of the larvae, as well as the shape of the relationship between egg weight and offspring survival. This suggests that cricket eggs frequently face heterogeneous environments with respect to egg and hatchling survival; the implication of habitat heterogeneity on the evolution of an optimal egg size is considered. The relationships between the reproductive components and female age and size, as well as between egg size and variation in cricket life-history, are discussed in an ecological and evolutionary context.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Egg size-fecundity trade-off; Fitness function; Gryllus; Optimal propagule size

Year:  1995        PMID: 28306850     DOI: 10.1007/BF00329806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  The ecological context of life history evolution.

Authors:  L Partridge; P H Harvey
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Testing hypotheses of adaptive variation in cricket ovipositor lengths.

Authors:  Michael J Bradford; Paul A Guerette; Derek A Roff
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  ESTIMATING THE FORM OF NATURAL SELECTION ON A QUANTITATIVE TRAIT.

Authors:  Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS.

Authors:  Russell Lande; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Climatic adaptation and species status in the lawn ground cricket : III. Ovipositor length.

Authors:  Sinzo Masaki
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  SPECIATION IN NORTH AMERICAN FIELD CRICKETS: EVIDENCE FROM ELECTROPHORETIC COMPARISONS.

Authors:  Richard G Harrison
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  THE CAUSES OF NATURAL SELECTION.

Authors:  Michael J Wade; Susan Kalisz
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.694

  7 in total
  10 in total

1.  Evolution of individuality during the transition from unicellular to multicellular life.

Authors:  Richard E Michod
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Fundamental Dimensions of Environmental Risk : The Impact of Harsh versus Unpredictable Environments on the Evolution and Development of Life History Strategies.

Authors:  Bruce J Ellis; Aurelio José Figueredo; Barbara H Brumbach; Gabriel L Schlomer
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2009-06

3.  From endosymbionts to host communities: factors determining the reproductive success of arthropod vectors.

Authors:  Irit Messika; Mario Garrido; Hadar Kedem; Victor China; Yoni Gavish; Qunfeng Dong; Clay Fuqua; Keith Clay; Hadas Hawlena
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Body size-specific maternal effects on the offspring environment shape juvenile phenotypes in Atlantic salmon.

Authors:  Njal Rollinson; Jeffrey A Hutchings
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Maternal investment in egg size: environment- and population-specific effects on offspring performance.

Authors:  Katja Räsänen; Anssi Laurila; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Body size and fecundity in the waterstrider Aquarius remigis: a test of Darwin's fecundity advantage hypothesis.

Authors:  Richard F Preziosi; Daphne J Fairbairn; Derek A Roff; Julie M Brennan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  There Is No Influence of Egg Size on Sex Allocation in Arrhenotokous Lineages of Thrips tabaci Lindeman.

Authors:  Saranda Musa; Márta Ladányi; József Fail
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Reproductive trade-offs of the estuarine copepod Eurytemora affinis under different thermal and haline regimes.

Authors:  Anissa Souissi; Jiang-Shiou Hwang; Sami Souissi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Intra- and trans-generational costs of reduced female body size caused by food limitation early in life in mites.

Authors:  Andreas Walzer; Peter Schausberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  No adaptation of a herbivore to a novel host but loss of adaptation to its native host.

Authors:  Amir H Grosman; Adrián J Molina-Rugama; Rondinelli Mendes-Dias; Maurice W Sabelis; Steph B J Menken; Angelo Pallini; Johannes A J Breeuwer; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.