Literature DB >> 28306805

Regulation of foraging trips and incubation routine in male and female wandering albatrosses.

Henri Weimerskirch1.   

Abstract

The resolution of the conflict between eggcare and foraging was studied in male and female wandering albatrosses. The foraging zone and range, duration of incubation shifts and foraging trips, and associated changes in body mass were studied. Costs during incubation, expressed as the time spent incubating and the proportional loss of body mass, were similar for both sexes. The mass gained at sea was related to the duration of foraging trips, but the relationship was much less significant in males, where foraging ranges, though similar on average to those of females, were very variable. Males foraged in more southerly waters than females, and gained mass more rapidly. Only females appeared to regulate the duration of foraging trips, and this compensated for the mass lost during the incubation fast. Previous breeding experience had no influence on foraging efficiency. Egg desertion because of depletion of body reserves was very rare because birds have a wide "safety margin", i.e. the difference between the average body mass when relieved and that at nest desertion. This safety margin enables the birds to compensate for the high variability in the duration of foraging trips, and is probably a reason for the high breeding success of wandering albatrosses. Decisions to return from the sea to the nest or to desert the nest are probably related to the status of body reserves, and have been selected in the large wandering albatross so that both present and future reproductive success are maximised.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body mass; Foraging; Incubation; Wandering albatross

Year:  1995        PMID: 28306805     DOI: 10.1007/BF00333308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  1 in total

1.  ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF EGRET AND HERON BROOD REDUCTION.

Authors:  Douglas W Mock; Geoffrey A Parker
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.694

  1 in total
  16 in total

1.  Do naive juvenile seabirds forage differently from adults?

Authors:  Louise Riotte-Lambert; Henri Weimerskirch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Females better face senescence in the wandering albatross.

Authors:  Deborah Pardo; Christophe Barbraud; Henri Weimerskirch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Patterns of aging in the long-lived wandering albatross.

Authors:  Vincent Julien Lecomte; Gabriele Sorci; Stéphane Cornet; Audrey Jaeger; Bruno Faivre; Emilie Arnoux; Maria Gaillard; Colette Trouvé; Dominique Besson; Olivier Chastel; Henri Weimerskirch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Incubation patterns in a central-place forager affect lifetime reproductive success: scaling of patterns from a foraging bout to a lifetime.

Authors:  Akiko Shoji; Kyle H Elliott; Stéphane Aris-Brosou; Doug Crump; Anthony J Gaston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Vultures of the seas: hyperacidic stomachs in wandering albatrosses as an adaptation to dispersed food resources, including fishery wastes.

Authors:  David Grémillet; Aurélien Prudor; Yvon le Maho; Henri Weimerskirch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Age-related variation in foraging behaviour in the wandering albatross at South Georgia: no evidence for senescence.

Authors:  Hannah Froy; Sue Lewis; Paulo Catry; Charles M Bishop; Isaac P Forster; Akira Fukuda; Hiroyoshi Higuchi; Ben Phalan; Jose C Xavier; Daniel H Nussey; Richard A Phillips
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Biparental incubation-scheduling: no experimental evidence for major energetic constraints.

Authors:  Martin Bulla; Will Cresswell; Anne L Rutten; Mihai Valcu; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.671

8.  Biparental incubation patterns in a high-Arctic breeding shorebird: how do pairs divide their duties?

Authors:  Martin Bulla; Mihai Valcu; Anne L Rutten; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  As the egg turns: monitoring egg attendance behavior in wild birds using novel data logging technology.

Authors:  Scott A Shaffer; Corey A Clatterbuck; Emma C Kelsey; Alex D Naiman; Lindsay C Young; Eric A VanderWerf; Pete Warzybok; Russell Bradley; Jaime Jahncke; Geoff C Bower
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Weathering a Dynamic Seascape: Influences of Wind and Rain on a Seabird's Year-Round Activity Budgets.

Authors:  Pierre A Pistorius; Mark A Hindell; Yann Tremblay; Gavin M Rishworth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.