Literature DB >> 28306646

Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Surgeons Performing Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Chantal C J Alleblas1, Anne Marie de Man, Lukas van den Haak, Mark E Vierhout, Frank Willem Jansen, Theodoor E Nieboer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) prevalence among surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery.
BACKGROUND: Advancements in laparoscopic surgery have primarily focused on enhancing patient benefits. However, compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery imposes greater ergonomic constraints on surgeons. Recent reports indicate a 73% to 88% prevalence of physical complaints among laparoscopic surgeons, which is greater than in the general working population, supporting the need to address the surgeons' physical health.
METHODS: To summarize the prevalence of MSDs among surgeons performing laparoscopic surgery, we performed a systematic review of studies addressing physical ergonomics as a determinant, and reporting MSD prevalence. On April 15 2016, we searched Pubmed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsychINFO. Meta-analyses were performed using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method.
RESULTS: We identified 35 articles, including 7112 respondents. The weighted average prevalence of complaints was 74% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 65-83]. We found high inconsistency across study results (I = 98.3%) and the overall response rate was low. If all nonresponders were without complaints, the prevalence would be 22% (95% CI 16-30).
CONCLUSIONS: From the available literature, we found a 74% prevalence of physical complaints among laparoscopic surgeons. However, the low response rates and the high inconsistency across studies leave some uncertainty, suggesting an actual prevalence of between 22% and 74%. Fatigue and MSDs impact psychomotor performance; therefore, these results warrant further investigation. Continuous changes are enacted to increase patient safety and surgical care quality, and should also include efforts to improve surgeons' well-being.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28306646     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  15 in total

1.  Short-Term Clinical Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Ying Kong; Shougen Cao; Xiaodong Liu; Zequn Li; Liankai Wang; Cunlong Lu; Shuai Shen; Houxin Zhu; Yanbing Zhou
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Physical and Mental Impact of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on the Surgeon: French vs. American Positions. A Randomized and Controlled Study.

Authors:  José E Carmona; Jorge A Higuerey; Doubraska Gil; Mabel Castillo; Valentina Escalona
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Assessment of Factors Associated With Internal Carotid Injury in Expanded Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Abdulaziz AlQahtani; Nyall R London; Paolo Castelnuovo; Davide Locatelli; Aldo Stamm; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol; Hussam Elbosraty; Roy Casiano; Jacques Morcos; Ernesto Pasquini; Georgio Frank; Diego Mazzatenta; Garni Barkhoudarian; Chester Griffiths; Daniel Kelly; Christos Georgalas; Narayanan Janakiram; Piero Nicolai; Daniel M Prevedello; Ricardo L Carrau
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Less Morbidity with Robot-Assisted Gastric Bypass Surgery than with Laparoscopic Surgery?

Authors:  J Cahais; R M Lupinacci; O Oberlin; N Goasguen; K Zuber; A Valverde
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Ergonomics in Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Survey of the North American Skull Base Society.

Authors:  Pier Paolo Mattogno; Filippo Marciano; Michael P Catalino; Davide Mattavelli; Paola Cocca; Nicola Francesco Lopomo; Piero Nicolai; Edward R Laws; Ian Witterick; Shaan M Raza; Anand K Devaiah; Liverana Lauretti; Alessandro Olivi; Marco M Fontanella; Fred Gentili; Francesco Doglietto
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-05-17

6.  Postural ergonomics and work-related musculoskeletal disorders in neurosurgery: lessons from an international survey.

Authors:  Georgios Mavrovounis; Torstein R Meling; Jesus Lafuente; Konstantinos N Fountas; Andreas K Demetriades
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Gynaecologists' and general surgeons' preference for the features of integrated theatres: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Tom K Holland; Stephen Morris; Alfred Cutner
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 8.  Tips and Tricks to Improve Ergonomics, Efficacy, Versatility, and Overcome Limitations of Micro Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Sarvajit Biligere; Chin-Tiong Heng; Cecilia Cracco; Reshma Mangat; Chloe Shu-Hui Ong; Karthik Thandapani; Takaaki Inoue; Kemal Sarica; Ravindra B Sabnis; Mahesh Desai; Cesare Scoffone; Vineet Gauhar
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-05-19

Review 9.  Ergonomics in Interventional Radiology: Awareness Is Mandatory.

Authors:  Francois H Cornelis; Leo Razakamanantsoa; Mohamed Ben Ammar; Raphael Lehrer; Idriss Haffaf; Sanaa El-Mouhadi; Francois Gardavaud; Milan Najdawi; Matthias Barral
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  Operating hurts: a study of EAES surgeons.

Authors:  Antonia C Wells; Magnus Kjellman; Simon J F Harper; Mikael Forsman; M Susan Hallbeck
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.