OBJECTIVES: Voriconazole, a first-line agent for the treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFIs), is metabolized by CYP2C19. A significant proportion of patients fail to achieve therapeutic trough concentrations with standard weight-based voriconazole dosing, placing them at increased risk for treatment failure, which can be life threatening. We sought to test the association between the CYP2C19 genotype and subtherapeutic voriconazole concentrations in adults with IFIs. PATIENT AND METHODS: Adults receiving weight-based voriconazole dosing for the treatment of IFIs were genotyped for the CYP2C19*2, *3, and *17 polymorphisms, and CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotypes were inferred. Steady-state voriconazole trough plasma concentrations and the prevalence of subtherapeutic troughs (<2 mg/l) were compared between patients with the CYP2C19*17/*17 (ultrarapid metabolizer, UM) or *1/*17 (rapid metabolizer, RM) genotype versus those with other genotypes. Logistic regression, adjusting for clinical factors, was performed to estimate the odds of subtherapeutic concentrations. RESULTS: Of 70 patients included (mean age 52.5±18 years), 39% were RMs or UMs. Compared with patients with the other phenotypes, RMs/UMs had a lower steady-state trough concentration (4.26±2.2 vs. 2.86±2.3, P=0.0093) and a higher prevalence of subtherapeutic troughs (16 vs. 52%, P=0.0028), with an odds ratio of 5.6 (95% confidence interval: 1.64-19.24, P=0.0044). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that adults with the CYP2C19 RM or UM phenotype are more likely to have subtherapeutic concentrations with weight-based voriconazole dosing. These results corroborate previous findings in children and support the potential clinical utility of CYP2C19 genotype-guided voriconazole dosing to avoid underexposure in RMs and UMs.
OBJECTIVES:Voriconazole, a first-line agent for the treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFIs), is metabolized by CYP2C19. A significant proportion of patients fail to achieve therapeutic trough concentrations with standard weight-based voriconazole dosing, placing them at increased risk for treatment failure, which can be life threatening. We sought to test the association between the CYP2C19 genotype and subtherapeutic voriconazole concentrations in adults with IFIs. PATIENT AND METHODS: Adults receiving weight-based voriconazole dosing for the treatment of IFIs were genotyped for the CYP2C19*2, *3, and *17 polymorphisms, and CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotypes were inferred. Steady-state voriconazole trough plasma concentrations and the prevalence of subtherapeutic troughs (<2 mg/l) were compared between patients with the CYP2C19*17/*17 (ultrarapid metabolizer, UM) or *1/*17 (rapid metabolizer, RM) genotype versus those with other genotypes. Logistic regression, adjusting for clinical factors, was performed to estimate the odds of subtherapeutic concentrations. RESULTS: Of 70 patients included (mean age 52.5±18 years), 39% were RMs or UMs. Compared with patients with the other phenotypes, RMs/UMs had a lower steady-state trough concentration (4.26±2.2 vs. 2.86±2.3, P=0.0093) and a higher prevalence of subtherapeutic troughs (16 vs. 52%, P=0.0028), with an odds ratio of 5.6 (95% confidence interval: 1.64-19.24, P=0.0044). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that adults with the CYP2C19 RM or UM phenotype are more likely to have subtherapeutic concentrations with weight-based voriconazole dosing. These results corroborate previous findings in children and support the potential clinical utility of CYP2C19 genotype-guided voriconazole dosing to avoid underexposure in RMs and UMs.
Authors: Thomas J Walsh; Elias J Anaissie; David W Denning; Raoul Herbrecht; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis; Kieren A Marr; Vicki A Morrison; Brahm H Segal; William J Steinbach; David A Stevens; Jo-Anne van Burik; John R Wingard; Thomas F Patterson Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Sarah C Sim; Carl Risinger; Marja-Liisa Dahl; Eleni Aklillu; Magnus Christensen; Leif Bertilsson; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Arwa Hassan; Jürgen Burhenne; Klaus-Dieter Riedel; Johanna Weiss; Gerd Mikus; Walter E Haefeli; David Czock Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Fabien Lamoureux; Thomas Duflot; Jean-Baptiste Woillard; David Metsu; Tony Pereira; Patricia Compagnon; Hélène Morisse-Pradier; Mona El Kholy; Luc Thiberville; Jana Stojanova; Christian Thuillez Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 5.283
Authors: Ben De Pauw; Thomas J Walsh; J Peter Donnelly; David A Stevens; John E Edwards; Thierry Calandra; Peter G Pappas; Johan Maertens; Olivier Lortholary; Carol A Kauffman; David W Denning; Thomas F Patterson; Georg Maschmeyer; Jacques Bille; William E Dismukes; Raoul Herbrecht; William W Hope; Christopher C Kibbler; Bart Jan Kullberg; Kieren A Marr; Patricia Muñoz; Frank C Odds; John R Perfect; Angela Restrepo; Markus Ruhnke; Brahm H Segal; Jack D Sobel; Tania C Sorrell; Claudio Viscoli; John R Wingard; Theoklis Zaoutis; John E Bennett Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2008-06-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: S A Scott; K Sangkuhl; C M Stein; J-S Hulot; J L Mega; D M Roden; T E Klein; M S Sabatine; J A Johnson; A R Shuldiner Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: L Bernal-Martínez; L Alcazar Fuoli; B Miguel-Revilla; A Carvalho; M S Cuétara Garcia; J Garcia-Rodriguez; C Cunha; E Gómez-García de la Pedrosa; A Gomez-Lopez Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: J Kevin Hicks; Rod E Quilitz; Rami S Komrokji; Timothy E Kubal; Jeffrey E Lancet; Yanina Pasikhova; Dahui Qin; Wonhee So; Gisela Caceres; Kerry Kelly; Yasmina S Salchert; Kevin Shahbazian; Farnoosh Abbas-Aghababazadeh; Brooke L Fridley; Ana P Velez; Howard L McLeod; John N Greene Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 6.875