PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Podocytes are critical components of the nephron filtration barrier and are depleted in many kidney injuries and disease states. Terminally differentiated adult podocytes are highly specialized, postmitotic cells, raising the question of whether the body has any ability to regenerate lost podocytes. This timely question has recently been illuminated by a series of innovative studies. Here, we review recent progress on this topic of significant interest and debate. RECENT FINDINGS: The innovation of genetic labeling techniques enables fate tracing of individual podocytes, providing the strongest evidence yet that podocytes can be replaced by nearby progenitor cells. In particular, two progenitor pools have recently been identified in multiple studies: parietal epithelial cells and cells of renin lineage. These studies furthermore suggest that podocyte regeneration can be enhanced using ex-vivo or pharmacological interventions. SUMMARY: Recent studies indicate that the podocyte compartment is more dynamic than previously believed. Bidirectional exchange with neighboring cellular compartments provides a mechanism for podocyte replacement. Based on these findings, we propose a set of criteria for evaluating podocyte regeneration and suggest that restoration of podocyte number to a subsclerotic threshold be targeted as a potentially achievable clinical goal.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Podocytes are critical components of the nephron filtration barrier and are depleted in many kidney injuries and disease states. Terminally differentiated adult podocytes are highly specialized, postmitotic cells, raising the question of whether the body has any ability to regenerate lost podocytes. This timely question has recently been illuminated by a series of innovative studies. Here, we review recent progress on this topic of significant interest and debate. RECENT FINDINGS: The innovation of genetic labeling techniques enables fate tracing of individual podocytes, providing the strongest evidence yet that podocytes can be replaced by nearby progenitor cells. In particular, two progenitor pools have recently been identified in multiple studies: parietal epithelial cells and cells of renin lineage. These studies furthermore suggest that podocyte regeneration can be enhanced using ex-vivo or pharmacological interventions. SUMMARY: Recent studies indicate that the podocyte compartment is more dynamic than previously believed. Bidirectional exchange with neighboring cellular compartments provides a mechanism for podocyte replacement. Based on these findings, we propose a set of criteria for evaluating podocyte regeneration and suggest that restoration of podocyte number to a subsclerotic threshold be targeted as a potentially achievable clinical goal.
Authors: R Ariel Gomez; Brian Belyea; Silvia Medrano; Ellen S Pentz; Maria Luisa S Sequeira-Lopez Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2013-12-15 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Kevin Schulte; Katja Berger; Peter Boor; Peggy Jirak; Irwin H Gelman; Kenton P Arkill; Christopher R Neal; Wilhelm Kriz; Jürgen Floege; Bart Smeets; Marcus J Moeller Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-09-26 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Arndt T Petermann; Ron Krofft; Mary Blonski; Keiju Hiromura; Michael Vaughn; Raimund Pichler; Sian Griffin; Takehiko Wada; Jeffrey Pippin; Raghu Durvasula; Stuart J Shankland Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Jeffrey W Pippin; Matthew A Sparks; Sean T Glenn; Sandra Buitrago; Thomas M Coffman; Jeremy S Duffield; Kenneth W Gross; Stuart J Shankland Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Matthias J Hackl; James L Burford; Karie Villanueva; Lisa Lam; Katalin Suszták; Bernhard Schermer; Thomas Benzing; János Peti-Peterdi Journal: Nat Med Date: 2013-11-24 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Stefano Da Sacco; Kevin V Lemley; Sargis Sedrakyan; Ilenia Zanusso; Astgik Petrosyan; Janos Peti-Peterdi; James Burford; Roger E De Filippo; Laura Perin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yuliang Wang; Diana G Eng; Natalya V Kaverina; Carol J Loretz; Abbal Koirala; Shreeram Akilesh; Jeffrey W Pippin; Stuart J Shankland Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Natalya V Kaverina; Diana G Eng; Benjamin S Freedman; J Nathan Kutz; Tyler J Chozinski; Joshua C Vaughan; Jeffrey H Miner; Jeffrey W Pippin; Stuart J Shankland Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2019-03-29 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Stefan M Czerniecki; Nelly M Cruz; Jennifer L Harder; Rajasree Menon; James Annis; Edgar A Otto; Ramila E Gulieva; Laura V Islas; Yong Kyun Kim; Linh M Tran; Timothy J Martins; Jeffrey W Pippin; Hongxia Fu; Matthias Kretzler; Stuart J Shankland; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Randall T Moon; Neal Paragas; Benjamin S Freedman Journal: Cell Stem Cell Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 24.633
Authors: Kotaro Haruhara; Takaya Sasaki; Natasha de Zoysa; Yusuke Okabayashi; Go Kanzaki; Izumi Yamamoto; Ian S Harper; Victor G Puelles; Akira Shimizu; Luise A Cullen-McEwen; Nobuo Tsuboi; Takashi Yokoo; John F Bertram Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-02-24 Impact factor: 10.121