Literature DB >> 28306096

Lens formation from cornea implanted into amputated hindlimbs of Xenopus laevis larvae requires innervation or proliferating cell populations in the stump.

S M Cannata1, S Bernardini1, S Filoni1.   

Abstract

The capacity of amputated early and late limbs of larval Xenopus laevis to promote lens-forming transformations of corneal implants in the absence of a limb regeneration blastema has been tested by implanting outer cornea fragments from donor larvae at stage 48 (according to Nieuwkoop and Faber 1956), into limb stumps of larvae at stage 52 and 57. Blastema formation has been prevented either by covering the amputation surface with the skin or by reconnecting the amputated part to the limb stump. Results show that stage 52 non-regenerating limbs could promote lens formation from corneal implants not only when innervated but also when denervated. A similar result was observed in stage 57 limbs where blastema formation was prevented by reconnecting the amputated part to the stump. In this case, relevant tissue dedifferentiation was observed in the boundary region between the stump and the autografted part of the limb. However, stage 57 limbs, where blastema formation was prevented by covering the amputation surface with skin, could promote lens formation from the outer cornea only when innervated. In this case, no relevant dedifferentiation of the stump tissues was observed. These results indicate that blastema formation is not a prerequisite for lens-forming transformations of corneal fragments implanted into amputated hindlimbs of larval X. laevis and that lens formation can be promoted by factors delivered by the nerve fibres or produced by populations of undifferentiated or dedifferentiated limb cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lens formation; Limb; Xenopus laevis

Year:  1996        PMID: 28306096     DOI: 10.1007/BF00377225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rouxs Arch Dev Biol        ISSN: 0930-035X


  24 in total

Review 1.  Control mechanisms in cell-type conversion in newt lens regeneration.

Authors:  T Yamada
Journal:  Monogr Dev Biol       Date:  1977

2.  Effect of denervation on hindlimb regeneration in Xenopus laevis larvae.

Authors:  S Filoni; L Paglialunga
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.880

3.  Lens differentiation from the cornea following lens extirpation or cornea transplantation in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  P R Waggoner
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1973-10

4.  Developmental biology. Growth factor lends a hand.

Authors:  J M Slack
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Growth factors from nerves and their roles during limb regeneration.

Authors:  A L Mescher
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1983

Review 6.  The urodele limb regeneration blastema. Determination and organization of the morphogenetic field.

Authors:  D L Stocum
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.880

Review 7.  Fibroblast growth factor and the control of vertebrate regeneration and repair.

Authors:  D Gospodarowicz; A L Mescher
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  FGF-2 induces regeneration of the chick limb bud.

Authors:  G P Taylor; R Anderson; A D Reginelli; K Muneoka
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  Stimulation in cell culture of mesenchymal cells of newt limb blastemas by EDGF I or II (basic or acidic FGF).

Authors:  P Albert; B Boilly; J Courty; D Barritault
Journal:  Cell Differ       Date:  1987-06

10.  Examination of fibronectin distribution and its sources in the regenerating newt limb by immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization.

Authors:  J D Nace; R A Tassava
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.780

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.