Literature DB >> 28305500

On the phenotype and development of mutants of early neurogenesis inDrosophila melanogaster.

Ruth Lehmann1, Fernando Jiménez1, Ursula Dietrich1, José A Campos-Ortega1.   

Abstract

The central nervous system (CNS) ofDrosophila develops from precursor cells called neuroblasts. Neuroblasts segregate in early embryogenesis from an apparantly undifferentiated ectoderm and move into the embryo, whereas most of the remaining ectodermal cells continue development as epidermal cell precursors. Segregation of neuroblasts occurs within a region called the neurogenic field. We are interested in understanding how the genome ofDrosophila controls the parcelling of the ectoderm into epidermal and neural territories. We describe here mutations belonging to seven complementation groups which effect an abnormal neurogenesis. The phenotypes produced by these mutations are similar. Essential features of these phenotypes are a conspicuous hypertrophy of the CNS accompanied by epidermal defects; the remaining organs and tissues of the mutants are apparently unaffected. The study of mutant phenotype development strongly suggests this phenotype to be due to misrouting into the neural pathway of development of ectodermal cells which in the wildtype would have given rise to epidermal cells, i.e. to an initial enlargement of the neurogenic region at the expense of the epidermogenic region. These observations indicate that the seven genetic loci revealed by the mutations described in this study contribute to control the neurogenic field. The present results suggest that in wildtype development neurogenic genes are supressed within all derivatives of the mesoderm and endoderm and some derivatives of the ectoderm, and conditionally expressed in the remaining ectoderm. The organisation of the neurogenic field in the wildtype is discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila; Early neurogenesis; Neurogenic mutants

Year:  1983        PMID: 28305500     DOI: 10.1007/BF00848482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol        ISSN: 0340-0794


  16 in total

1.  A fate map for the larval epidermis of Drosophila melanogaster: localized cuticle defects following irradiation of the blastoderm with an ultraviolet laser microbeam.

Authors:  M Lohs-Schardin; C Cremer; C Nüsslein-Volhard
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  A cytogenetic analysis of the lozenge pseudoalleles in Drosophila.

Authors:  M M GREEN; K C GREEN
Journal:  Z Indukt Abstamm Vererbungsl       Date:  1956

3.  Chromosomal Deficiencies and the Embryonic Development of Drosophila Melanogaster.

Authors:  D F Poulson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1937-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Maternal effects of zygotic mutants affecting early neurogenesis inDrosophila.

Authors:  F Jiménez; J A Campos-Ortega
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1982-05

Review 5.  The genetics of embryogenesis in Drosophila.

Authors:  T R Wright
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 1.944

6.  Analysis of a gene in drosophila.

Authors:  W J Welshons
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The cytogenetic analysis of a fractured gene in Drosophila.

Authors:  W J Welshons
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Characterization of the female-sterile mutant almondex of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M P Shannon
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Phase-partition fixation and staining of Drosophila eggs.

Authors:  M Zalokar; I Erk
Journal:  Stain Technol       Date:  1977-03

10.  Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila.

Authors:  C Nüsslein-Volhard; E Wieschaus
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-10-30       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  61 in total

1.  Notch and wingless regulate expression of cuticle patterning genes.

Authors:  C S Wesley
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  The muscle pattern of the Drosophila abdomen depends on a subdivision of the anterior compartment of each segment.

Authors:  Joanna Krzemien; Caroline C G Fabre; José Casal; Peter A Lawrence
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 3.  Notch and the awesome power of genetics.

Authors:  Iva Greenwald
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Dominant-negative suppression of big brain ion channel activity by mutation of a conserved glutamate in the first transmembrane domain.

Authors:  Andrea J Yool
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  2007

5.  Insight into Notch Signaling Steps That Involve pecanex from Dominant-Modifier Screens in Drosophila.

Authors:  Tomoko Yamakawa; Yu Atsumi; Shiori Kubo; Ami Yamagishi; Izumi Morita; Kenji Matsuno
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Notch signaling does not regulate segmentation in the honeybee, Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Megan J Wilson; Benjamin H McKelvey; Susan van der Heide; Peter K Dearden
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 7.  The many facets of Notch ligands.

Authors:  B D'Souza; A Miyamoto; G Weinmaster
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Continuum limits of pattern formation in hexagonal-cell monolayers.

Authors:  R D O'Dea; J R King
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 9.  Integration of Drosophila and Human Genetics to Understand Notch Signaling Related Diseases.

Authors:  Jose L Salazar; Shinya Yamamoto
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  The embryonic development of the Drosophila visual system.

Authors:  P Green; A Y Hartenstein; V Hartenstein
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.249

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.