Literature DB >> 28304532

Influence of environmental factors on the homoeotic effect ofloboid-ophthalmoptera inDrosophila melanogaster.

Willem J Ouweneel1.   

Abstract

This paper deals with the influence of environmental factors, particularly those that may be expected to change the rate of growth in the larval period, on the homoeotic wing-like outgrowths in the eyes of the strainloboid-ophthalmoptera (see Ouweneel, 1969a, b).The penetrance of the homoeotic effect increases with maternal age (Table 1); Delcour (1968) furnished evidence that there is a relation between maternal age and growth rate of tissues in the larva. Penetrance is inversely related to temperature; at low temperatures the development of the whole larva is strongly retarded, but the growth of the eye disc is probably less retarded, so that it grows relatively more than at higher temperatures. It is notable that the temperature-sensitive period (24-60 h after hatching, at 25° C; Fig. 1) precedes, and coincides with, the period of abnormal hyperplasia in the disc (Ouweneel, 1969b).Acetamide, given in the food, enhances the number of facets so that even the wild type eye size may be reached; in proportion to its concentration it moreover strongly increases the penetrance of the wing-like outgrowths. At higher concentrations, however, when eye enlargement is maximal, the penetrance of the outgrowths decreases again (Figs. 2-5). The optimal concentration (at which the penetrance is maximal) is higher at higher temperatures (Figs. 2-5; cf. Fig. 7). The sensitive period for acetamide extends from about 0-55 h after hatching (at 25° C) (Fig. 6). Uracil increases the penetrance of the homoeotic effect (Table 2). Sodium tetraborate seems to increase the penetrance of the homoeotic outgrowths, but to reduce their expressivity slightly at higher concentrations. Starvation (Tabel 3) and farnesol medium prolong the larval period, but do not show clear-cut effects on the homoeotic phenomenon, probably because they only postpone metamorphosis, and do not retard the whole of larval development (compare temperature effect, above). UV irradiation influenced penetrance, but lower dosages had a greater effect than higher ones; the former suppressed the homoeotic effect at early larval ages, but stimulated it at later ages; this points to the occurrence of two separate sensitive periods for UV (Table 4). In all experiments clear-cut sexual differences in sensitivity were observed, which may be ascribed to the sex-linked location of theophthalmoptera modifier (Ouweneel, 1969a).Evidence can be found in the literature that enhanced proliferation is a prerequisite for many homoeotic phenomena in the broad sence (cf. Fig. 8). The present study and previous data show that also homoeotic mutations often interact with agents causing changes in growth rate; it is possible that the basic action of all homoeotic mutations has to do with such changes.

Entities:  

Year:  1969        PMID: 28304532     DOI: 10.1007/BF00577679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wilhelm Roux Arch Entwickl Mech Org        ISSN: 0043-5546


  17 in total

1.  The phenocopy concept: illusion or reality?

Authors:  W LANDAUER
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1959-11-15

2.  The genetic background of chemically induced phenocopies in Drosophila.

Authors:  R B GOLDSCHMIDT; L K PITERNICK
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1957-06

3.  For the unstable determination of the imaginal discs of Drosophila; contribution to the manifestation of the mutant antennaless.

Authors:  M VOGT
Journal:  Biol Zent Bl       Date:  1947

4.  [Not Available].

Authors:  M VOGT
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1947-04-15

5. 

Authors:  Rudolf Geigy
Journal:  Wilhelm Roux Arch Entwickl Mech Org       Date:  1931-06

6.  Morphology and development ofloboid-ophthalmoptera, a homoeotic strain inDrosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Willem J Ouweneel
Journal:  Wilhelm Roux Arch Entwickl Mech Org       Date:  1969-03

7.  [Proliferation and transdetermination in blastemas of the female genital disc of drosophila melanogaster after culture in vivo].

Authors:  Géza Mindek
Journal:  Wilhelm Roux Arch Entwickl Mech Org       Date:  1968-09

8.  Some effects of x-rays on development in Drosophila.

Authors:  C A VILLEE
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1946-03

9.  [Developmental capacity of embryonal blastema in Drosophila following cultivation in an adult host].

Authors:  E Hadorn; R Hürlimann; G Mindek; G Schubiger; M Staub
Journal:  Rev Suisse Zool       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 0.642

10.  Genetic analysis of loboid-ophthalmoptera, a homoeotic strain in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W J Ouweneel
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 1.082

View more
  4 in total

1.  Developmental capacities of young and mature, wild-type andopht eye imaginal discs inDrosophila melanog aster.

Authors:  Willem J Ouweneel
Journal:  Wilhelm Roux Arch Entwickl Mech Org       Date:  1970-03

2.  Temperature sensitivity ofTumorous head, a homoeotic mutant ofDrosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  N Bournias-Vardiabasis; M Bownes
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1979-03

3.  Genetic analysis of loboid-ophthalmoptera, a homoeotic strain in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W J Ouweneel
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  The early history of the eye-antennal disc of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brandon P Weasner; Justin P Kumar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.402

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.