Literature DB >> 28304142

Biomarkers and anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: C-reactive protein trajectory is the gold standard.

Stephen R Smith1, Peter Pockney1, Ryan Holmes2, Fiona Doig2, John Attia3, Elizabeth Holliday3, Rosemary Carroll1, Brian Draganic1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage is a feared complication following colorectal surgery. Early prediction results in improved clinical outcome, but accurate predictive factors remain elusive. Many biomarkers have been studied with respect to diagnosis of anastomotic leakage but the concept of trajectory testing, using biomarkers, has not been assessed with regards to early diagnosis of anastomotic leak.
METHODS: C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), white cell count (WCC) and gamma-glutamyl transferase were assessed for predictive utility in diagnosing anastomotic leakage with emphasis on identifying an association with change in their levels or trajectory. Levels were collected preoperatively and daily for the first 5 post-operative days on patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery, involving an anastomosis. Anastomotic leakage was defined clinically by operative or radiological intervention. Comparison was made between biomarkers and clinical anastomotic leakage, using receiver operator characteristic curves for logistic models, based on trajectory of the four biomarkers.
RESULTS: A total of 197 consecutive patients were analysed. Eleven patients developed clinical anastomotic leakage. An association of biomarker trajectory with anastomotic leakage was observed for WCC, PCT and CRP, but not for gamma-glutamyl transferase. CRP was the superior biomarker based on trajectory, with area under the receiver operator curve of 0.961.
CONCLUSION: This study identifies change in CRP, WCC and PCT as potential markers of anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery and in particular highlights CRP trajectory as extremely accurate in diagnosing anastomotic leakage requiring intervention. External validation should be sought before incorporating this into routine clinical practice, given the numbers in this study.
© 2017 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-reactive protein; anastomotic leak; biomarker; colorectal surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28304142     DOI: 10.1111/ans.13937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  14 in total

1.  Usefulness of serum C-reactive protein and calprotectin for the early detection of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Nuno J G Rama; Marlene C C Lages; Maria Pedro S Guarino; Óscar Lourenço; Patrícia C Motta Lima; Diana Parente; Cândida S G Silva; Ricardo Castro; Ana Bento; Anabela Rocha; Fernando Castro-Pocas; João Pimentel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.374

2.  Early biochemical predictors of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: a role for serum amylase and C-reactive protein.

Authors:  Nicolò Pecorelli; Giovanni Guarneri; Marco Palucci; Lorenzo Gozzini; Alessia Vallorani; Stefano Crippa; Stefano Partelli; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  C-reactive protein (CRP) trajectory as a predictor of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection: A multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Vincent T Hoek; Cloë L Sparreboom; Albert M Wolthuis; Anand G Menon; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink; André D'Hoore; Niels Komen; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 3.917

4.  Consensus on the definition of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A modified Delphi study.

Authors:  Claire Pm van Helsdingen; Audrey Chm Jongen; Wouter J de Jonge; Nicole D Bouvy; Joep Pm Derikx
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  C-reactive protein to albumin ratio is a key indicator in a predictive model for anastomosis leakage after esophagectomy: Application of classification and regression tree analysis.

Authors:  Chen-Ye Shao; Kai-Chao Liu; Chu-Ling Li; Zhuang-Zhuang Cong; Li-Wen Hu; Jing Luo; Yi-Fei Diao; Yang Xu; Sai-Guang Ji; Yong Qiang; Yi Shen
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Near-infrared fluorescence image-guidance in anastomotic colorectal cancer surgery and its relation to serum markers of anastomotic leakage: a clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Jacqueline van den Bos; Audrey C H M Jongen; Jarno Melenhorst; Stéphanie O Breukink; Kaatje Lenaerts; Rutger M Schols; Nicole D Bouvy; Laurents P S Stassen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Surgical complications in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Haleh Pak; Leila Haji Maghsoudi; Ali Soltanian; Farshid Gholami
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-05-11

8.  Usefulness of Inflammation-Based Prognostic Scores for Predicting the Risk of Complications After Radical Resection of Colorectal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Wenhao Man; Huajun Lin; Zhao Liu; Lei Jin; Jin Wang; Jun Zhang; Zhigang Bai; Hongwei Yao; Zhongtao Zhang; Wei Deng
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 9.  Predictive and Diagnostic Biomarkers of Anastomotic Leakage: A Precision Medicine Approach for Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Mark Gray; Jamie R K Marland; Alan F Murray; David J Argyle; Mark A Potter
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-05-25

10.  Oxidative Stress Level as a Predictor of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Surgery.

Authors:  Jiajun Luo; Hongxue Wu; Yu Yang; Yue Jiang; Jingwen Yuan; Qiang Tong
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.