H B Mehta1, G M Vargas2, D Adhikari1, F Dimou1,3, T S Riall4. 1. Departments of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA. 2. Louisiana State University-Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA. 3. University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA. 4. University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Abstract
AIM: The objectives were to determine trends in the use of chemotherapy as the initial treatment and to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of initial chemotherapy vs resection of the primary tumour on survival (intention-to-treat analysis) in Stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC). METHOD: This cohort study used 2000-2011 data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database, including patients ≥ 66 years of age presenting with Stage IV CRC. Cox proportional hazards models and instrumental variable analysis were used to compare the effectiveness of chemotherapy as the initial treatment with resection of the primary tumour as the initial treatment, with 2-year survival as the end point. RESULTS: The use of chemotherapy as the first treatment increased over time, from 26.8% in 2001 to 46.9% in 2009 (P < 0.0001). The traditional Cox model showed that chemotherapy as the initial treatment was associated with a higher risk of mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.27-1.44]. When accounting for known and unknown confounders in an instrumental variable analysis, chemotherapy as the initial treatment suggested benefit on 2-year survival (HR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.44-1.04); however, the association did not reach statistical significance. The study findings were similar in six subgroup analyses. CONCLUSION: The use of chemotherapy as the initial therapy for CRC increased substantially from 2001 to 2009. Instrumental variable analysis found that, compared with resection, chemotherapy as the initial treatment offers similar or better 2-year survival in patients with Stage IV CRC. Given the morbidity and mortality associated with colorectal resection in elderly patients, chemotherapy provides an option to patients who are not good candidates for resection. Colorectal Disease
AIM: The objectives were to determine trends in the use of chemotherapy as the initial treatment and to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of initial chemotherapy vs resection of the primary tumour on survival (intention-to-treat analysis) in Stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC). METHOD: This cohort study used 2000-2011 data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database, including patients ≥ 66 years of age presenting with Stage IV CRC. Cox proportional hazards models and instrumental variable analysis were used to compare the effectiveness of chemotherapy as the initial treatment with resection of the primary tumour as the initial treatment, with 2-year survival as the end point. RESULTS: The use of chemotherapy as the first treatment increased over time, from 26.8% in 2001 to 46.9% in 2009 (P < 0.0001). The traditional Cox model showed that chemotherapy as the initial treatment was associated with a higher risk of mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.27-1.44]. When accounting for known and unknown confounders in an instrumental variable analysis, chemotherapy as the initial treatment suggested benefit on 2-year survival (HR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.44-1.04); however, the association did not reach statistical significance. The study findings were similar in six subgroup analyses. CONCLUSION: The use of chemotherapy as the initial therapy for CRC increased substantially from 2001 to 2009. Instrumental variable analysis found that, compared with resection, chemotherapy as the initial treatment offers similar or better 2-year survival in patients with Stage IV CRC. Given the morbidity and mortality associated with colorectal resection in elderly patients, chemotherapy provides an option to patients who are not good candidates for resection. Colorectal Disease
Authors: Elizabeth Chrischilles; Kathleen Schneider; June Wilwert; Gregory Lessman; Brian O'Donnell; Brian Gryzlak; Kara Wright; Robert Wallace Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Chung-Yuan Hu; Christina E Bailey; Y Nancy You; John M Skibber; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; Barry W Feig; George J Chang Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2015-03-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: D J Sargent; R M Goldberg; S D Jacobson; J S Macdonald; R Labianca; D G Haller; L E Shepherd; J F Seitz; G Francini Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-10-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jeremy A Rassen; M Alan Brookhart; Robert J Glynn; Murray A Mittleman; Sebastian Schneeweiss Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2009-04-08 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Carrie N Klabunde; Julie M Legler; Joan L Warren; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Deborah Schrag Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2007-05-25 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Mayra Tisminetzky; Jerry H Gurwitz; Dongjie Fan; Kristi Reynolds; David H Smith; Hassan Fouayzi; Sue Hee Sung; Robert Goldberg; Alan S Go Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 6.053